Does anyone else think Princess Diana was just an upper-class promiscuous attention seeker?

Question

Variant of recently deleted: "Does anyone else think Princess Diana was just an upper-class w***e?".

Answer 1

She may have been,but what gives them the right to treat her in that fashion.

Answer 2

No. And why the sexism? You don't use insults to refer to men who sleep with more than one woman, so why call a woman a w***e if she has several boyfriends?

Answer 3

I wouldn't go as far as calling her a w***e but I certainly agree with you that she was a upper-class promiscuous attention seeker

Answer 4

Not the words I would use to decribe her,but yes!

Answer 5

no

Answer 6

She was upper class, yes. Promiscuous attention seeker? along with 95% of the rest of us - men and women, yes - she just had a larger audience.

Answer 7

Is it not past your bedtime

Answer 8

Couldn't have put it better myself. How she got to the Top Ten of 100 Greatest Britons I'll never understand. She was not a Saint and used the press to further her own interests far more than any other member of the Royal Family ever has.

Answer 9

this sentiment is not allowed.....but yes I agree...secretly..as do most educated men....

Answer 10

No, I don't.  And I think it's disgusting to talk about someone who can no longer defend herself.  You are the attention seeker by asking this question.

Answer 11

Come on now let's not forget the sleaze bag husband that drove her to seek love and attention.

Answer 12

You are the attention seeker hun, not her!

Answer 13

Does anyone else think that the person who asked this question is just a brain dead, nasty moron?

Answer 14

I think she was a naive young woman who thought she could make her husband love her. Unfortunately, she was wrong because he had already found, & was in a relationship with, the love of his life. I think she used the only ways open to her to gain his attention by courting the press at every opportunity.

If she had any affairs then who can blame her. Her husband was being unfaithful to her even before the wedding & I think by the end she probably felt like a brood mare.

I think she was a badly mis-understood & deeply unhappy woman for most of her short life.

Answer 15

please dont say dumb s h i t about one of the few white women i happen to like, i think your seeking attention by posting this dumb as question........or u might be seeking an *** whoopin

Answer 16

f**k off!

Answer 17

is this a lot of jealousy coming out sounds like it to me.

   she was a fabulous person and a very smart and beautiful woman.

Answer 18

No. The Royal Family 'chose' her as being suitable to marry the heir to the throne. She was expected to be a compliant little girl and turn a blind eye to her tomcat husband's escapades with that horsey bit (Camilla Parker Bowls).

Instead, the poor girl became distraught at her new husband's lack of love for her and reacted accordingly.

She was used as a brood mare and that's all. She was treated very badly.

Whatever she became THEY (The Royal Family) turned her into it!

Answer 19

No -  She was married to a man who was openly in love and having s*x with another woman (Camilla Parker Bowles). What would you do in Diana's circumstance? Stay home and cry - I doubt it.

Answer 20

No not at all, Diana was being used in her marriage and deserved better, she was a lovelly lady.. Too young to die...

In my opinion she was not an attention seeker....

Answer 21

none of us knew the truth and the real diana so we really cannot comment only assume.  as our assumptions will probably be wrong and the poor lady is now deceased, there is no point to this question.  I also think calling he a w***e is totally disrespectful and totally out of order.  think of her family reading this how do you think they would feel?  Remember she was loved by the majority of people so it seems that your views are personal towards a lady you did not know

Answer 22

Wash Your mouth out.

Answer 23

Yes, I do.