0 LIKES LikeUnLike
Here is the story if you don't know it.http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080212/ap_en_ce/people_miley_cyrusSo, Miley Cyrus and her dad were riding in the BACK of a vehicle and now they are getting criticized for not wearing seatbelts. Well the law says you don't have to wear one in the back, so what is the big freaking deal?The best part is that the article states that 65% of 13-16 year olds killed in car wrecks were not wearing seat belts.Well how many were in the back? How many of them were in the front? How many were drunk driving accidents? It doesn't say? Well that is convienient. Another example of "stretched" stats.I wish the thought police would stop and find something better to do. Am I the only one who is tired of all of this?If they broke the law I would understand but they didn't.
Tags:
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Latest activity: earlier. This question has 19 answers.