Although we have all been lead to beleive that Iraq (along with Afganistan) have become 'irritant' terriost countries that have required the intervention of western politics and millitary to retain control of their government, is it not also concievable that oil has lead the western world here in the process. Think about it, countries such as darfur and Bhurma and zimbabwe have been riddled with corrupt powers overlooking them yet western intervention to protect these countries has been minimal to say the least. The difference between them and Iraq is power of oil and the survival of western economy as we know it and yet with Mr. Bush recently liasing with a newly imposed iraqi government and agreeing to lease oil to the west for oil and the sudden suggestion that american military must be removed from combat in 17 months doesnt this all seem a bit, well obvious. I ask you guys is it just me or do others feel that this is all a bit well staged?
Tags: