Does life has no meaning a priori?

Question

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Have a great day!

Answer 1

Time should be removed from the equation.  Life has, therefore, eternal meaning.

Answer 2

Interesting question.  Well, if you mean "a priori" such that we have an accepted assumption of life without reference to experience, then it would not have meaning.  However, this cannot be since to live life is to fully operate through empirical evidence / experience because life as we know it is derived solely from experience.

Answer 3

Your question doesn't make sense - what exactly are you asking?

Answer 4

Life is meaningful if we live a life of awareness.

Life is meaningless if we live a life of unawareness.

Answer 5

life is meaningful if you want to make it meaningful!

Answer 6

If you mean from, or before, birth then yes. All life has the same original meaning, to survive. As we grow and develop our minds (souls) then we can change our meaning (destiny) at will.

Answer 7

Of course - life is meaningless. Suffering has no meaning, searching for  point has no meaning. You must live, travel your way. The life - is the travel. From one point to another. And I think, you must go this way with hapiness.

   There is one interesting poet (not English), he wrote: "May be the meaning of the life is its meaningless..." Sorry, its poor translation, I am not English speaker. But I liked this words very much.

Answer 8

I think the meaning of life is life itself. Now the purpose of life I believe is to experience and to experience, we can explore.

From the time a child is born, they naturally explore, experiencing everything they can.

Answer 9

In general usage, meaning refers to a plan.  My life is my existence.  If there is a plan that includes my existence, then it has to come from my Creator.  If God doesn't exist, there can be no meaning whatsoever.  Nature doesn't do plans.

And it's obviously impossible for us to create the reason why we came into existence unless we claim to have created ourselves.