Does ron paul need to come back as an independent?

Question

i mean he should for the sanity of the US

one has socialist ways which im backing with no choice of my own. The other is a warmonger who like is the biggest old tard

Answer 1

Yeah, and run with Kucinich or John Edwards---bi-partisan powerhouse:)

Answer 2

I hate to anser a question with a question, but "Who is Ron Paul?"  He's no more a conservative than Bill Clinton.  When he was in the primary debates and was asked a question, he'd talk for 5 minutes and not say anything remotely related to the question. He's a waiste of time.

Answer 3

No, it's too late. Not technically...I think he has until September 18 to nominate, but why would he? He ran as a GOP candidate, and he didn't make it because his profile isn't high enough and he's more a libertarian than a conservative. Why he remains in a party run by neocons is a mystery. If Ron Paul wants to be president, he should quit the GOP, start a real libertarian movement and begin sowing the seeds of a campaign for 2012 in Jan next year.

Answer 4

I hope he does or at least files the forms to have our write in votes counted.  We could take it from there.....

Answer 5

I don't think he wants to.

Answer 6

I wish he would, I haven't had a good laugh since checking out his numbers in the primary.  Did he even win a single county?

Answer 7

I certainly wish he would! Obama is going to try to further the Dem's normal attacks on the second amendment and McCain wants to occupy Iraq as long as possible.

I think, if Ron Paul could gather a good team and keep the few radical idiots in check, he could stand a chance to run as the candidate for REAL change and reform in Washington.