In a recent entry in the 'Watts up with that?' blog, Anthony Watts tried to compare the surface station data (from the Hadley Centre and NASA GISS) to the satellite lower troposphere data (from UAH and RSS). Coincidentally, he screwed up his analysis royally by neglecting the fact that the datasets use different reference periods. Tamino at the Open Mind blog does the correct analysis here:
http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/whats-up-with-that/
And comes up with this plot comparing the 4 normalized datasets from 1979-Present:
http://tamino.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/4way.jpg
As you can see, they all give very similar results, and their observed warming trends are almost identical over this period.
Does this put to rest the myth that the surface temperature record is biased due to urban heat island (or any other) effect(s)?
Tags: