I realize that offensive line calls for some copious amounts of bulk, but our team runs a zone blocking scheme and this year's offensive line is a lot smaller than last year's. Last year our offensive line average six foot one and 240 pounds, whereas this year we average around five eleven to six foot and 210 pounds.
I'm the smallest starting linemen at around five foot nine 190-195 pounds, and I man the left guard spot. I'm also the fastest as I run maybe a high 4.8 to a low 4.9. Our left tackle is the second largest, six foot two 220 pounds, and he's second fastest with his best forty maybe a high 4.9. All together the left side of our line is pretty damned fast and also relatively strong (I deadlifted 455 pretty easily last time I checked, and our LT can break 500). Our center is the meat of the line, at 230-235 pounds, and is something around five foot seven. He also is the strongest, as he not only deadlifts something like 550 but also benches 315. He just lacks endurance, but can one on one noseguards without a problem, leaving our guards to attack linebackers.
Right guard is largely unresolved, but I figured coach would insert a kid whose six foot one 215 pounds in who plays basketball. Naturally he's pretty quick and getting strong. Our right tackle is around the same size, slightly lighter, also plays basketball, and is very quick on his feet.
As you can tell our line is mostly composed of athletic, quick linemen, not huge meaty run blockers who maul defenders for fun. In our league the average defensive lineman is on average 220 pounds. Our line last year, despite its size, couldn't get the run game started against sometimes undersized dlineman. They also ran the same scheme.
So once again, what matters more: bulk or athleticism? Thanks.
Tags: