Why are people still surprised by England's lack of International success? The furthest they've ever got in the European Championship is the Quarter finals (same as Wales), and only twice have they progressed beyond the Quarters in the World Cup (one more than Wales and both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland!).
Also, the foriegn footballers playing in England has nothing to do with England's lack of International success. When English clubs - particularly Liverpool - ruled Europe in the 70's & 80's with home grown talent, England still did not qualify for 2 World cups in 1974 & '78 (whereas Scotland did) nor the European champiuonship in '76. Check out Enland's record since 1950 when they bit the bullet and decided to join the International community and partake in the World Cup (the USA knocked them out that year!) Their record over 60 years is nowhere near say Germany, Italy, Brazil, Argentina, France, Holland or even Uruguay! They are perennial underachievers due to the technically inferior way that English and British clubs play. It's different at Club level where other factors have a bearing. Also, more recently the English clubs are even stronger due to they're massive buying power. As Bobby Robson once said, England are at best merely a top 8 side internationally.
(Mark Stanfield, Porth, Rhondda)
I agree with the welsh git ,I am English.long live the king (Jason)
Tags: