Does this proves that science is right about the origin of life?

Question

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080515171023.htm

Answer 1

My guess is that they will ignore the scientific implications and just go for the "but to make life took a person to create it, so there must be a creator"  position.

It is like when they find a transitory fossil.  The fundies just say it is a different species and demand to see the transitory fossils on both sides.   The only way to make them happy is to have a continuous chain of parent-offspring fossils.   For abiogenesis they want to see it happen in the oceans right before their eyes.

They are strong in their ignorance.

Answer 2

Certainly proves one thing.

It takes intelligence to do it.

Simon t - and what exactly are the scientific implications that have anything at all to do with whether there was a Creator or not?

Answer 3

It doesn't prove it but it does support it by showing a variety of cell structures could have easily been created in nature.  

Answer 4

No, It proves that science don't know anything about the origin of life. For thousands of years science has been trying to prove there is no God, & to this day they are still trying to prove it, So if they know so much then why is it taking thousands of yrs. When I can prove God in One minute.

Answer 5

It's not ironclad but it is another piece in the pile.  I suspect that there is quite a bit that we yet need to learn about the origins of life.

Answer 6

Very interesting article.  Thanks for the link.

Answer 7

Not at all,this is cell manipulation.

Answer 8

No. I believe in the Bible record

Answer 9

Isn't Science amazing with all the new discoveries coming out. Beats reading a stagnant 2000 year old book.