Does this puntuation make sense? is it good grammar?

Question

When one arrives at locked doors and is forced to drive around to verify the building is open; presumes to take a test in a room clearly unsatisfactory, with inadequate temperatures for testing; then distracted by an employee at the testing center walking in and out of the room apologizing for the situation, is clearly enough reason for a dispute for the ONE point needed to pass the exam.

Answer 1

Punctuation is incorrect and the point is unclear.  This is what I think you mean.

The following are the reasons that I believe I should receive one point in order to pass the exam:

1.  The doors were locked when I arrived and I became agitated because I was later than I wanted to be because I had to drive around the building to find an unlock door.

2.  I had difficulty concentrating on the test because the testing room was too hot (or cold) during the test.  .

3.  I was distracted by an employee of the testing center walking in and out of the room apologizing for the interruption.

4.  I am sure that I would have made one more point if there had been better testing conditions.

Answer 2

First:  it's punCtuation.

Second, nothing in your run-on sentence makes any sense at all!  If the sentence doesn't make sense, the words don't go together properly, then the punctuation can't have much to do with it.

And it's all one sentence.  Run on.  too long.  break it up, but first, you have to have a sentence that actually SAYS something...locked doors, drive around?  Temperatures?  apoplgizing?  nothing goes together at all.

Answer 3

I agree it is nothing to do with punctuation but with the structure of the sentence. When I read it as it is right now, it looks like abracadabra.

Good luck!