I had a friend of mine explain this to me at one point several years ago and due to the price of gas currently, I've given it thought once again and I'm wondering if it makes sense to anybody.
Due to the cost of drilling, refining, and producing oil domestically vs. internationally, it is actually in the financial intrest of american consumers for the United States to continue relying on foreign oil.
The main issue of cost has to deal with employees, specifically wages and benenifits. In the US, Federal Minimum wage is $ 6.55 per hour. Assuming a 40 hour work week, this equates to roughly $1,048.00 before taxes. In Saudi Arabia, there is no oficial minimum wage, however the U.S. State Dept. estimates it unnoficially to be around 1500 riyals ($400) per month (based on minimum required monthly contributions to the pension system) for Saudi Citizens, and non-existant for foreign workers. This is similar for many other countries in the Middle East. As a result, the oil companies can pay less to workers in the Middle East, than those who do the same work in the United States.
To me this somewhat makes sense with the exception of one major flaw: This theory relies on the belief that the oil company's savings from off shore production are in turn passed on to the consumer, as opposed to being kept in their coffers.
Tags: