ESPN coverage was horrendous ?

Question

Did anybody else noticed how bad ESPN coverage of the Bristol race was? For starters. they miss showing the wreck when Martin Truex Jr got taken out of the race. Also they missed two green starts for being in commercials. Once they got back to the live feed... the race had started already. I miss the Fox and the TNT coverage.

Answer 1

Would you rather it be on Pay Per View?

Answer 2

I agree with our VP, TNT is way worse. Although I do miss Fox.

Answer 3

cause of this i got hot pass no commercials and you don't miss a thing!

Answer 4

I agree and what the heck does Brad Daughtery know about NASCAR. Everytime he says something it's dumber than the last the last thing. He subtracts from an already weak broadcast team.

Answer 5

ESPN tends to cover the 1st and 2nd place cars.The also focus on cars whos sponsors are sponsoring the event or advertising on ESPN.

If there is a wreck and it does not involve a "media" darling then they take their sweet time getting to it.

Coverage poor.

Answer 6

I know what you mean.  I don't really care for ESPN coverage either.  I much more prefer FOX.  If I had a choice, I'd want Daryl, Larry, and Mike to commentate all season!  

Answer 7

Any coverage not Fox as far as the races goes totally sucks...I miss DW

Answer 8

Anything is better than TNT.

Answer 9

They missed way too much. In additon, they need to pull the cameras back some... watching 2 cars up close gives no perspective on the track or anything...  

Answer 10

Yes I agree ,the coverage was terrible. I wish Fox could do all of the races !