Edge vs. Undertaker - h**l in a cell match - no blood ?!?

Question

Am I the only one who notticed that at SummerSlam 2008's h**l in a cell match between Undertaker and Edge there was almost no blood on neither Taker nor Edge. Well I must admit, Undertaker was bleeding from his arm and Edge from his back (he had a cut) but that was all. No blood on their face ???!!! That was the only h**l in a cell match with no blood on wrestlers' faces... :(( So fake... What do you think happened ?

Answer 1

I didn't matter if there was any blood because the h**l in a Cell was still awesome.I think it was the best HIAC in the last 7 years.

Answer 2

Everyone is saying " d**n PG" but that's not the case. Remember a couple of weeks before Wrestlemania, Shawn Michaels and Ric Flair were against La Familia in a cage match on Smackdown. Blood was pooring from both Ric and Michaels head. I think they wanted to enfisize more on Edge dying then on a horrific blood battle.

Here is the bloody match on Smackdown. Look at Flairs hiar.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yz7tK3QZ...

Answer 3

RIp Off i feel bad for da peopl who baut tix

Answer 4

I thought summerslam stunk this year it wasnt even worth 40$!

Answer 5

it was a great match with or without blood

Answer 6

For the Edge / Taker battle, it simply didn't need blood. It was great without any blood on anyone's faces

Answer 7

You also have to remember that this is the first HIAC in the PG era.

Answer 8

ok well if you base a good match or a hardcore match on how much blood there is, then you are completely biased, edge speared undertaker through the cage, the CAGE, do you realize how much force there was in that spear? and also he speared him through about everything, a table, the announce table (that was sick!) but then again, if you say blood makes a match hardcore, what about ecw when it really was extreme they didnt always bleed but they went through fire, and dont say that that wasnt insane of wouldnt hurt, hiac wasnt as good as some others but it was still amazing

Answer 9

they probably had a lot of internal bleeding because of the cage breaking and stuff i really dunno why undertaker didnt really give it all (lots of blood) owell at least he really got edge hurt!

Answer 10

these people dont know what there talking about pay per views are rated tv 14 like raw use to be so pg has nothing to do with pay per views there was no blood cuz the match didnt need it.but i was mad that there was no blood

Answer 11

yeah it boils down to ratings pg is a lower rate than usual so they have to be careful that someone doesn't get all bent out of shape about the extreme bloody faces but i don't know that's just what i am assuming

Answer 12

i dont know but mabey that fought so hard not to have blood comming from their faces . mabey that is y

Answer 13

PG is so g*y

Answer 14

YA i know. I was expecting alot of blood. What a waste of 40 bucks to see it. :(