Question:

Electric Field?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

An electron enters a parallel plate apparatus 10cm long and 2.0cm wide, moving horizontally 8.0x10^7m/s. If the potential difference across the plates is 600V, determine the following:

(a) the vertical deflection of the electron from its original path

(b) the velocity with which it leaves the parallel plate apparatus, in both magnitude and direction

HINT: This problem may be treated the same as if you had a gravitational projectile whose motion is the resultant of uniform motion in the horizontal plane and uniform acceleration in the vertical plane.

 Tags:

   Report

2 ANSWERS


  1. Please read this artice i have created , with an open mind to think about your question

    Gravity , a Relay Force that lies within Quarks or Gluons(although extremely unlikely). The following facts describe Gravity.

    1. All Gravity is "non-polar" or uniformly intact. Unlike an electromagnetic field, a field of gravity does not try to "swallow" itself and even though its field is not proportional to the origin in strength to an electromagnetic field, it is not gullible by any other subatomic particles in any way, however, it can be affected by an equal or opposite field not altered in force(unlike magnetizm;plasma,electrical current in metal,elc.) only in added matter to the mass can the field be manipulated in strength.

    2. Gravity works in the way that in in ( for example) Hydrogen releases 1 "particle" measurement by the proton, (suppose it is in a mass of gravity) in a frenzy of more highly exited gravitons that 1 graviton in lower acceleration (in comparison of faster gravitons; even though they too have a max velocity)is forced away (up)while still wanting to relay. As it relays the more momentum the graviton picks up it gets more accelerated towards the mass. Now keep in mind that gravitons repel against each other. With speed and the repulse, it will hit and only make quarks also giving them momentum. As this happens the graviton also continues to go to the center(of course quarks bundle up like the nickel -iron in the Earth) when it gets to the "center, center" it stops when the other gravitons that are faster force the weakened graviton" up", and the cycle repeats.

    3. The reason that I say that particles of this sort relay is that Magnetism and Gravity affect matter and never run out of energy. The only way to for atoms to affect others interatomicly is just that they send out and recall.

    4. It is the togetherness of Gravitons that make Gravity (a non-polar shape), every thing is to so the center but its is a means of perfectly centering a field ( the reason gravity is "non-polar" is that the positive and negative of Magnetism). So the gravity feild is stronger as you go down. But do not be fooled, imagine this.

    The entire body outputs 1100 "units"(lets suppose all units are released at the same time, this all happens at light speed anyway). All 1100 rush within to B, but soon only 100 can occupy B. The rest must fit in the A area. We are used to 1100 and smaller area is smaller gravity.

    5. keep in mind that when this document says" graviton" it is not directly a particle or anything, that is very much in deed unknown, but it is the energy released by non-anti/dark matter(I will go to that later)and that is that (even though I think that this universe is energy, the universe is all soft, you interpret the hardness by your biological composition, how else will the universe work at light speed. your shoes, head, your everything, light, all is "energy").And gravitons are just that.

    After reflecting these 5 points you are so saying how is it that light is affected by astronomical amounts of gravity like the sun. I must offer an explanation.

    1. we know that gravity of earth and the sun are the same, but what is different, it is that there is a bigger amount on the sun. So now the question is that, how does a preset amount of gravity affect photons at a light "wavelength"(because, quite frankly I do not think that electromagnetic radiation is not at a "wave", again the energy concept comes to play) to a specific angle in space. Well, like gravity, photons have momentum(light speed) with that accompanies Inertia, the light is repulsed and with "inertia" it goes at an angle, Yes. So now the question is, how do gravitons disturb the Inertia of .5times10to the negative6power of a meter of electromagnetic radiation. Well it seems that "slower" or less activated gravitons that are ready to return to the sun are in the way of " light" level electromagnetic energy and are "pushed" aside thus creating the curve (but this is also dictated by the "UU effect" but that is very complicated and we will look at this later).

    If you were to write a review on this, this would be the review, it is long and it is very unlikely to make any logic what so ever! So you can also ask someone that actually gets it to explain it and give examples. Gravity is one of the keys to unlocking the secrets matter, basically the universe and the cosmos.

    Elecromagnetizm: Electro Magnetizm is a very wierd concept to understand because so little of it is really understood. Exept form the basics the biggest thing is that it is really a vital think to the understanding of the Cosmos. Really, it is! Where to start? To basicly start, I belive that the magnetic force is located inside the Electron, as a matter to the fact,it is just like gravity( the relay habits and so on do I really need to go over that again?), the only 2 differences are that it affects matter with a stronger force in proportion to the particles and that it is not “non-polar(in other words, it does not have a perfectly round field).”I know what you are thinking, “ how does magnetizm possibly lie in the electron? Well, it does, ONLY WHEN however, when electrons have an absence of photons to control, or no photons at all, does an electron release these “Relay Particles” that come and go, these then long to return to their origin, or they might get into other fields where they also are accepted( this is why 2 objects with a magnetic field attract, such as metals) But what about Positive and Negative? The UU effect tells us that magnetism falls under itself as well. So it is reasonable to say that if it is that “ weak” then it should have a positive and negative selection to this. As a matter to the fact, this entire concept of magnetism came from the thinking, “ what can gravity be ?” If for example, bolt of lighening strikes, the electrons in the oxygen atoms were “Tamed.” Then, BOOM and there is an electromagnetic field that does not nessesseraly need to atract in the first place, REMEMBER “UU,” sorry I forgot to point that out, magnetism is in the way of desturbing photons in “special” conditions. We will talk about this later. And as of now that is like all I know on that topic, it is currently my main topic.

    CHART OF UNIVERSAL UNIVERSONALITY

    FOR THIS PART , PLEASE SEE THE PICTURES IN THIS PROFILE.

    UNIVERSAL UNIVERSONALITY

    Welcome to the most interesting and boring and most complex and contravercial and part part of my theory. Lets get stright forward, remember when I said the thing about the sun and gravity. It is all the UU my friend. You see, in a universe where there is diversity in the world of really, really, deep heart of sub atomics there is a beating heart of a relationships between all particles and a bonanza constantly happening in the universe. Basicly, UU says that everything,photon for example,has a little of everything in it,gravity. Gravity and photons, eventhough they do not work together in normal Earth conditions, in a black hole they combine in a frenzy of gravity, this is due to amounts of the gravity in comparison to light, also, it could be due to energy amounts, for example, there is a nuclear explosion and all radio waves are gone, or there is a bolt of lighning and your radio stops working for a moment, or there is a Solar Storm and solar wind knocks out satillites. My point is that there is a point in all preset amounts where if another force becomes too powerfull for the natural constraints of the first force are to be taken over. As exhibited in a black hole or in a solar storm. The same goes to the light curving in a gravity field, not all gravity curves at that amount, do you get the concept? Pretty simple right? If not then ask me.


  2. idk what aaron is talking about, but here is my answer

    (Ignore relativity ;p)

    first you need to calculate the force on the electron.

    you can do this by using couloub's law (I think, it's been a long time) anyways there is a formula you can use to calculate the force.

    one you have the force of the electron, you can calculate it's acceleration towards the positive plate with

    force=mass* acceleration

    any physics book will have the mass of an electron listed somewhere

    Next calculate the time it takes for the electron to travel 10 cm horizontally

    use distance = rate *time

    10cm=8.0x10^ m/s *time

    be careful of units

    once you have the time, you can calculate the change in the vertical direction with

    change in y = velocity intitial *time +1/2* acceleration * time^2

    make sure the sign of acceleration is correct (negative or positive depending on which way you have indicated it on your picture.... whut no picture! draw one! it helps! seriosly!)

    in this case

    velocity intial = 0

    because the electron is only moving horizontally

    next you calculate the final vertical velocity using another motion equation (gah I can't remember it off the top of my head, sorry)

    Then you create a right triangle with the vertical velocity and the horizontal velocity and you find the new velocity using pythagoreon's theorum, and you find the angle using trig

    The part at the bottom means, once you have the acceleration, it's just like one of those

    if a ball is thrown horizontally off a cliff with speed Vand it lands X meters away how high is the cliff and with what velocity did it hit the ground?

    the only difference is, you have to use couloumb's law to calculate the force and use newton's 2nd (?) law to calculate the acceleration. Then it is solved in the same manner
You're reading: Electric Field?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 2 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.