Question:

Environment Should Be Put First.. Agree?? Disagree???

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Agree or disagree?? Government or opposition?? Affirmative or negative?? Why??

 Tags:

   Report

22 ANSWERS


  1. No.

    People come first.  If 'environmentally friendly' harms people - then the choice is for the people.

    Remember the 'ozone hole' fiasco?  As a result of that stupidity people with asthma are forced to use less effective medications that have more frequent side effects.


  2. Agree

    Simply put if we slowly destory our world today, then our children and thier children will have to bear the burden.

    Anyone who believes in God in any orientation should be an enviormental activist.

  3. I agree. Too often we put our economic interests before our environmental. Money will always tempt people, but our planet is in a downward spiral towards environmental disaster, and we need to change the way we treat our planet.

  4. Agree.

  5. No.

    Because of the EPA, we pay more for utilities, factories have closed because the expense of cleaning the emmissions forced them to close or move out of the country. Many of our industries have vanished because raw materials from the US are too expensive and now we purchase raw materials from China, and other countries. because of environmentalists, we are dependent on other countries for fuel, clothing, and soon food. Why food? Because farmers are now growing corn, grasses and other vegetation to process into fuel instead of food. The environment should be second to people having jobs, and our country being self-sustaining.

  6. Agree or disagree?? Government or opposition?? Affirmative or negative?? Why??

  7. agreeeeee because if we dont care for the environment then we wont have anywhere to liveee

  8. Yes. The Human Right To Peace could prevent deaths and also prevent military damage to The Environment.

    The Human Right To own and the planet and conserve planetary resources could further this.  To introduce each into The Constituition of each nation as rights for citizens could help.

  9. This is a tough question. It can go so many ways. I believe that survival should be placed above environmental protection. We can't all live in the trees with fig leaves (sorry for the visual). I think that our economy demands oil. Until we move away from that total dependence on foreign oil is bad for our economy. Yes, I support drilling in ANWAR for the time being. There's a balance.

  10. Disagree. Having a great environment isn't worth c**p if we can't enjoy it freely and securely.

  11. Given the fact that I enjoy breathing clean air, drinking clean, safe water, and do know the necessity of trees I'd say we had better put it first. We all live on this planet together and if something isn't done it truly will be the Late Great Planet Earth.

  12. Over what?  Why the thumbs down, it is a question about what the environment should be put first over......

  13. It is like this. When you are up to your ears in alligators it is hard to remember the objective was to drain the swamp.

  14. YES BUT THERE ARE TIME THAT ENVIRONMENTALIST GET WRONG LIKE THE WHOLE SPOTTED OWL THING,

  15. Yeah i agree.

  16. Just rewrite this in a sentence and try to explain what exactly you are trying to say .

    Some one teach these benighted natives how to frame a question ,please!

  17. Private property rights should be put first.

  18. I believe in environmentally friendly politicians.

    http://www.lcv.org/

  19. If you were in the 3rd story of a burning building, would you let the fire department catch you is a blanket made of non recyclable plastic, even if it could only be used one time?

    Your answer will help me understand how you really feel.

  20. I agree, I'm actually writing my thesis on local environmental groups that are successful because Americans are finally pulling their heads out of the sand!!  The latest figure is 69% of Americans believe the environment is changing in a negative way because of human activity.  There is hope for our country!!  Now if we can get the 31% of conservatives to stop denying the problems, we may have a chance to leave a hospitable planet for our grandchildren to enjoy.

    And Happy Bunny, how are you going to enjoy your freedom with nowhere to live?  There's no technology to relocate 6 billion people to another planet or the moon.

  21. I'm just kinda Neutral on that one.

  22. i just dont understand with your question...

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 22 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.