Question:

Evolutionists and atheists, you make a theory first and strive hard to make it a convincing one; whereas...?

by Guest60974  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

.. the Bible is written by those who have received conviction in their lives about God. They did have personal encounters with Almighty that inspired them to pen down their divine revelations and experiences. But in your case, an insane person called Darwin made a theory out of intoxication and now, a vast number of ignorant people are carrying it on their shoulders desperately trying to find some proof to support it, failing miserably. Whatever the so called eveidence you got is nothing, but exaggerated stuff, which you know deep in your heart is rubbish. Am I right or not?

 Tags:

   Report
Answer The Question I've Same Question Too

31 ANSWERS

Sort By: Date  |  Rating

  1. Try again. You have it backwards.


  2. and the crazy man really believes there is someone next to him, even though i don't see the person, do i believe the crazy man?

  3. Thank You,you are correct.

    Edit super freak the bible states clearly the Earth is spherical and suspended in mid air.

  4. Not. And I don't believe in evolution

  5. No, you're not right.  Thanks for asking.

  6. My person encounter with the Almighty said they lied in the Bible.

  7. Yep, just like how Newton invented gravity and then went about trying to find something that supported it.

    ;P

  8. Nah.

  9. i thought we agreed on saving comedy for friday nights.

  10. No, you are not right. Evolution has be scrutinized more than 'any' other theory in science and has held up again and again and again and again to the volleys of noxious crazy Christian creationist nonsense that get flung at it. At this point rather than looking at evidence, Christians plug their ears and pretend it isn't there.

    Your holy book is obviously inspired by nothing more than ignorant men who herded sheep and goats; your side lost the debate, get over it.  

  11. There is evidence of evolution everywhere. You say that Darwin came to the idea of evolution under the influence, but the problem is that Darwin spent years developing his theory of evolution. The bible is not from divine encounters, it is mealy a fictional book used to provide comfort to people.

  12. I have one thing to say. Bullsh*t. Science requires evidence - religion requires faith. I don't care if you have received conviction in your life from a thing you can't see, hear, or communicate with (unless you talk to yourself) - I need proof. I would rather have exaggerated stuff than lies made up to suppress men by bigots needing to blame someone else for their stupidity.

  13. evolution has been proven

    catch up

    the bible was written by people who heard voices

    in todays world we call these people

    "schizophrenics "

  14. No, you're not right.

    The scientific method (generally applied) means that one observes all the evidence and forms theory to explain all of it.  If the evidence isn't explained, then a new theory must be developed.

    Your religion, on the other hand, relies on human authorities and scriptures.  Those scriptures are imperfect; they contradict themselves, and they often present absurdities and errors as fact.

    Don't believe me?  Do a little study of your own if you aren't afraid:

    http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com

  15. I'm not a Christian but am drawn to Intellegent Design from the philosophical perspective called Platonism.

    I think your essentially right in that religion is experiential, whereas scientific theories are empirical.

  16. How is it that you creationist dont understand this:-

    scientific THEORY mean THE EXPLANATION THAT BEST SUITS THE DATA

    scientific HYPOTHESIS means A GUESS WHICH IS TO BE TESTED AGAINST THE EVIDENCE

  17. no, you're not right.  first off the theory doesn't come first, the hypothesis does.  when you have enough solid evidence then you can call it a theory.

    how 'bout that crazy theory of gravity?  we all know that god makes tiny angels to hold our feet down.  that's why some people can jump higher than others, their angels are lighter!

  18. i think there is a lot of physical evidense to back darwin up what have you chrisians got a book of gibberish written in the middle east thousands of years ago by ignorant people

  19. "They did have personal encounters with Almighty that inspired them to pen down their divine revelations and experiences."

    Well then so did Mohammed, Buddha, all the creators of the Hindu religion, etc.  Heck, I guess even L Ron Hubbard was right about scientology.  They all have just as much evidence as you do...

  20. You are completely backwards.The assumption had been creationism for millenia.It was only in the light of overwhelming evidence that evolution was accepted,and as evidenced by you,only grudgingly.Still,facts cannot be ignored.

    If in a courtroom,some undocumented statement by a long dead person claimed a man was guilty of a crime,and this document was refuted by the physical evidence at the crime scene,a LOT of physical evidence.You would think it insane to convict based on the document,rather than the overwhelming physical evidence.Yet,you do not use this same logic when referring to your bible.Why are your beliefs so inconsistent?

  21. I am sorry to have to tell you this, but you are deluded. You believe in your fairy because someone told you to do so as the only way to avoid everlasting h**l. Meanwhile, what in god's name makes you believe that your fairy stories are superior to the fairy stories of islam or any other religion. Didn't they have their fairies help them be written? You should believe in them all, just in case you end up in everlasting h**l.  

  22. No, you are not right.  Something tells me that attempts to explain the gross errors in your rant would be like trying to teach a brick wall to tap dance; no matter how accurate my explanations, that wall's never going to perform.

  23. lol you are not

    omg, the answer directly beneath me had me screaming with laughter!!!

    you have no proof that god exists, just because alot of people say so, doesnt make it so. end of story.

  24. it looks like during one of these "personal encounters" with god, he'd have wispered to them "Hey, the earth is round, not flat."

    and for you or anyone to deny evolution as a fact, shows you will believe whatever so long as it suits your little bible stories.

  25. I dont think anyone really knows what is really going on, and I think it's very childish to make fun of someone else's beliefs even if you think it's ridiculous. If you ask me then Christianity is partly right, Darwin is partly right and theres a whole bunch of other stuff going that we dont know about.

  26. "the Bible is written by those who have received conviction in their lives about God. They did have personal encounters with Almighty that inspired them"

    Doesn't the fact that you have to lie so much to support your position tell you something about the quality of that position? It should.  

  27. No, you are not right.  A scientist postulates a hypothesis, based on something observed, then tests the hypothesis, and forms a theory based on the results, if the testing formed conclusive results.  The theory is then submitted into publication for peer review.  Other people read the theory, and test it, themselves.  If they can find anything wrong with the theory, they provide their own results, and the theory is proven false.  If the theory holds up to scrutiny, it is considered solid for as long as it holds up to evidence / testing.

    Darwin was not the first to hypothesize evolution, he simply provided the evidence necessary for evolution to gain enough traction as a legitimate theory.  All evidence continues to support the theory of evolution, so it's still accepted as accurate.

  28. Bible slaves- you take a book at random; you ignore all the contradictions, absurdities, and down right lies then call it true.

    Then you, without knowing anything about it condemn research done by thousands of scientists from every culture. They all used peer group checking, full scientific method. The evidence for evolution reaches into every corner of science.

    You wish to impose on us a return to the dark ages where all is myth and BLIND faith.

    Are you right - NO you are utterly wrong.

  29. Yes.

    Wait, today -is- opposites day, right?

  30. good tiger..i wonder if God created evolution

  31. You are talking bollocks.

    Ting!  Next, please.
You're reading: Evolutionists and atheists, you make a theory first and strive hard to make it a convincing one; whereas...?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 31 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Register Now
Unanswered Questions