Evolutionists prove your theory ,give me the time line of ''evolution''?

Question

i understand from the ''first ape'' to homo erectus was 45 million years or so

then 1 million years or so to man

so is homo more man than ape

or more ape than man?

give me the time lines [not any clever links give me the timming]

from the ape to the homo

then the homo to man

simple stuff really

give me the timming

your maths fails the theory

point by point what extra mutations came fom homo to man

but you can chose to ignore that

JUST GIVE ME THE TIME LINE

Answer 1

In general I am with your core position.  But the lady is right.  You are way over your head here as evidenced by your rambling unlearned presentation.

And that is the problem people like you create for us.  We all get labeled ignorant hicks.   Shame on you.   Go back to school and learn to think and communicate clearly.  Then and only then will you get any respect.

Answer 2

*yawn*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of...

Answer 3

Take your question to the religion section.  Please ask anthropologists something more stimulating than to prove what has already been proven.

Answer 4

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/spe...

Australopithecus ramidus - 5 to 4 million years BCE

Australopithecus afarensis - 4 to 2.7 million years BCE

Australopithecus africanus - 3.0 to 2.0 million years BCE

Australopithecus robustus - 2.2 to 1.0 million years BCE

Homo habilis - 2.2 to 1.6 million years BCE

Homo erectus - 2 to 0.4 million years BCE

Homo sapiens - 400,000 to 200,000 years BCE

Homo sapiens neandertalensis - 200,000 to 30,000 years BCE

Homo sapiens sapiens - 130,000 years BCE to present

http://www.wsu.edu:8001/vwsu/gened/learn...

Answer 5

I do not think you have the wit to appreciate the time line, as you do not have enough wit to know that we are apes. Evolutionary theory is not " proved ", but has the evidence to support it. Your ramblings have not a scintilla of evidence in support of them. You can not only falsify a scientific paradigm, but must erect a paradigm in it's place. You creationist morons have yet to intimate even that. ( math supports the theory of evolution by natural selection )

PS I can barley read your additional comments. I doubt they are worth reading anyway. Go back to thumping your bible and reveling in you ignorance.

Answer 6

Give me a timeline for your so-called "theory of gravity" eh?