Evoultion Not TRUE!!!?

Question

share your opinion

that evolution is or isnt real.

obviously it isnt they havent found the missing links from ape to modern man. I mean they find human bones and if they find another one close to it they are assuming that it is a ape man. -.-

Answer 1

You are assuming evolution is not true because of 'missing link' bones which have never been found?

'NOT YET!' That's my answer, which also includes the 'YES!' to evolution.

Answer 2

There should be another theory about Man, instead of the two boring theories of creationism and evolutionism.  Hey, why don't we create one that is equally contested? Give Answers a chance?

Answer 3

The Answerer named "hmmmm" is correct, both conjectures (Creationism, which needs tweaking, and the Evolution/Uniformitarian Model, which is severe misinterpretation of the data) need to be set aside for a third more comprehensive model.

This third candidate will entirely support the Holy Scriptures once Christians realize that their dating of 6,000 years for the age of the Earth is wrong and that the 6 days of Creation are actually 6 (day) “epochs” to the chronological history of our Solar System, which spans between 11 million to 24 million years.  Additionally, the geological “marker” of 6,000 years that they cite as proof of a 6,000-year Earth really is the result of periodic and cyclic cosmocataclysms that have annihilated the Earth, thus stopping and restarting the “geological clock” in 6,000-year increments.  Simultaneously, the highly over exaggerated age of the Earth at 5 billion years is also erroneous as claimed by the Evolutionary/Uniformitarian Model, and Evolutionists will understand this once they realize that our paternal star is NOT our current Sun, but the star Sirius B, for the Sirius Binary is the missing half of our Solar System which was formerly a tertiary system with 3 stars and 11 planets as documented in the ancient record.  

Sirius B was originally a Blue Supergiant B-1 class hydrogen-burning star that was about 5 solar masses larger than our current Sun, and thus, as is the case with all Blue Supergiants, had only a 10 million year life expectancy, because hydrogen stars are fast burning stars.  In the first “epoch” we had only 2 members to our system, the Earth and Sirius B (Sirius A, our Sun [technically being Sirius C], and 10 other planets were still in the belly of Sirius B, and would be ejected later in a mass stellar ejection due to a cometary impact [Comet Metis: “Prudence” or “Knowledge”] that impacted into Sirius B’s equatorial region).  

This cometary impact event had to occur “before” Sirius B reached its 9th million year when it would have normally completely depleted its hydrogen and hyperdilated 100 times it’s mass into a helium-burning Red Supergiant.  Sirius B NEVER reached this stellar phase due to the cometary impact, which caused a 70% depletion of its mass as it expelled a stellar ejection that formed Sirius A, 10 new planets and our Sun, called by the Ancients the “Osirian trinary Stellar System”.

So what this means is that “before” the Earth was a mere 9 million years in age, this cometary event and subsequent stellar discharge took place… it was witnessed by earthbound intelligent humans who recorded the event into the mythological record… which clearly indicates that modern Homo sapiens had already come into existence within the first 9 million years of the Earth’s age. Hence, Evolution with its gargantuan ages and “species evolving” mechanism is completely erroneous.

The cometary impact was the causative agent of the Flood on Earth, for the impact into Sirius B sprayed outwardly stellar debris that pulverized the Earth with mass celestial bombardment which collapse the “vapor canopy” that originally encapsulated the Earth, which I call the “Prima Altohydrosphere”… just as Creationists have successfully conjectured being a bubble of frozen H2O, carbon, nitrogen and other trace elements that compressed the atmospheric pressure to produce a 30% greater oxygen concentrate and a 300% greater geomagnetic amplitude resulting in “Gigantism” in which EVERYTHING grew to be enormous in stature, and had great longevity in life expectancy.  Hence, Noah and the populous of the Earth had to be giants, which appear to be substantiated by St. Augustine who wrote in his book, “The City of God”, about the bones of giant 36-feet tall humans often found on the shores of North Africa in his day, including his personal eye witness account of the unearthing from the African seashore of a giant human molar the size of a man’s fist.

The mass celestial bombardment of Earth from the “Metisian Impact Event” on Sirius B for the first time ruptured the Earth’s weakest and thinnest surface, the oceanic floors, with great rift faults and adjacent perpendicular fracture zones.  One gigantic megabollide projectile impacted into the Southeast Pacific off the coast of Chile.  The “antipodal force” shot straight through the middle of the Earth and ruptured out the opposite side.  This immense force uplifted an entire vast river valley region dotted with large lakes, rivers and an inland saltwater sea and instantly shot it straight up into the air approximately 3 miles… this today is the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau.

Another massive megabollide land in the midst of a continental plateau that today no longer exists, it carved out a massive hole, being the largest visible crater impact site in the Solar System, its superstructure exceeding the Helles Crater on Mars (1,300 miles in diameter) by an additional 500 miles.  This was mythologized as the fire-breathing monster Aegides recorded in the Mythocorpus (body of myth).  The titanic pressure from the impact created an area rich in rare elements, cobalt, diamonds, radium, etc.  It has not yet been identified by geologists because they cannot see the forest from the trees. I have identified it as the “Congo Gigacrater” of central Africa.  It is no wonder that the African Blacks do not have a “flood myth” as do all the other worldwide and diverse cultures, for Africa was ground zero for the “Aegides Impact Event”, which following ensued the Great Flood as the Greek myth of Aegides indicates.  Additionally, it cracked the African Continent with the African Great Rift Fault Valley that extends up the Red Sea into the Dead Sea, and its antipodal force shot through the Earth and lifted from the bottom of the Pacific Ocean the islands of the Fiji, Salomon, and New Zealand Complex just as the myths of those cultures say.  

The Aegides Impact Event subsequently caused the Mid-Atlantic Ridge to SUDDENLY burst as the highly pressurized subterranean seas encapsulated within the asthenosphere of the Earth ruptured and jettisoned 20 miles into the sky.  The original sea level of the Earth was actually 2,800 feet below the current sea level.  The high precipitous mountains of today were nonexistent before the Flood, for these “uplifts” are “post-percussion features”, the direct result of “antipodal force” due to mass celestial bombardments.  In combination with the water in the collapsed frozen upper hydrospheric shield and the released subterranean seas, the sea level of the Flood must have rose 13,000 feet, and then reduced 10,200 feet to their current levels as 30% of the water resettled back into the subterranean cavities of the asthenosphere.  In the 1970’s, the U.S. Navy’s submersible geological research on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge reached these same conclusions.      

Rather than Evolution it appears that life emerged on Earth via a “polybiological explosion” of life, all in unison, where the Prima Altohydrosphere created a womb-like pressure cooker out of the Edenic Earth that can be termed the “Geocrucible Effect”, and requiring the irradiation not from a small G-2 class star like our Sun, but from a Blue Supergiants as quantum equations in 2002 determined that the heavier rare element on the Earth and in the human body could not have been created by our tiny star, but are the by-product of a Blue Supergiant.  So in reality life emerged via the process of “Spontaneous Polybiological Mass Profusionism” (SPMP) where the entire genetic species “Pool of Life” emerged to be “contemporaneous”.  The Egyptian Book of the Dead clearly infers to this process.  This ancient collection of “wisdom” appears to be fragments of scientific data from a former global technoculture (predating the ancient history to our current Earth Age) that had already figured out the quantum physics of our origins, but was completely wiped off the face of the Earth by one of the periodic cosmocataclysms.

Evolutionists have misinterpreted the Geological Column.  The stratification was not formed through long geological time.  It was formed SUDDENLY in periodic waves from the onslaught of cyclic cosmocataclysms.  We live on a “hydraulic planet”, and when it is catapulted through space from these titanic events that knock it off its axial of rotation, then the ocean displace out of their basins and overrun the continents due to “inertia”.  This in turns entombs life into alluvium soil (mud), being the primary agent for “fossilization”.  As the seas drain off the continents back into the basins the hydraulic viscosity suspends material in the medium according to its weight, thus forming STRATIFICATON of the Geological Column, and in the midst of it are the dead.  Thus, it is these periodic extinction level sidereal events that whittled away at the original “Pool of Life” incrementally entombing percentages of it into the Fossil Record.

Answer 4

Well, obviously not true in your case, pal.

Seeing as how the entirety of scientific knowledge - from the fossil record to molecular research - confirms that evolution is indeed true, I would hope that if you're going to dismiss evolution then you will also reject the rest of science. So, please - say no to gravity, medicine, or the idea that the earth revolves around the sun. And stop watching Barney because dinosaurs are a lie!

Answer 5

National Geographic recently reported that 10' feet of silt had been deposited in the delta of the Persian Gulf, which came from flooding that took place, and was carried by the Tigris & Euphrates Rivers of Mesopotamia, appx. 6700 years ago...

The cause of this flooding, was from the end of the last Ice Age, glaciers melted, and filled the Black Sea to overflowing, subsequently, the springs in the Taurus Mountains where the Tigris & Euphrates originate, swelled to mammoth proportions, and when the water arrived onto the FLAT, fertile crescent, everything was wiped out, for at least  generation!

Though the flood was localized (Not worldwide), Mesopotamia is where the Old Testament was written, so in essence, it was the "Whole World" to them!

This is also where the early semites (Proto-Jews) and Sumerians (Shinar, in Genesis) rebuilt their civilization, 6500 years ago. That would be 500-700 years before the Fundamentalist date of Creation (which is 4004 BCE).

I would think that's kind of odd, to have verified & documented Bibical archaeology taking place, nearly one millenium before the earth itself was "Created", so I would suggest taking at least a junior college-level science class, after you're finished with Sunday School!

Answer 6

Tectonic forces cause land to rise and fall. Eons ago India, then an island collied with the Asia land mass. This pushed up the land that eventually became Everest.

See:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/himalay...

The "missing link" argument is simply a convenient red herring. It ignores natural selection and the scale of time we're dealing with. Here's some information about human evolution:

Humans are part of the hominid family. They are both part of and descended from them. The process of this development is called evolution. In brief, this means that new species develop and expand as they are better at dealing with their environment then others. See: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/evo...

for a discussion of the evolution process.

The hominids include humans and the apes. They are part of the family Hominidae, of the order Primate. Humans did not "descend from the apes" We share a common ancestor with them and are considered "cousins." Chimpanzees, our closest relative, share a 99% match in DNA. In protein sequencing, the match is closer, no differences at all.  When man's protein sequencing is compared to gorillas there is only two differences in the match with hemoglobin, red blood cells and amino acids. Lastly the antgen-antibody reaction for humans is 97% from chimpanzees compared to 50% for baboons. In other words we're related. DNA is today used to show how closely people are related (as in determining paternity) and to determine if people were at a crime scene (as a means to determine guilt or innocence). It also is used to determine how long ago species split off from each other.

The split from the apes is put at 8 million years ago. That's based both on the fossil remains and the know rate of change for DNA. The first bipedal hominids (walking on two feet) is 4 million years ago. The first known bipedal hominids were the Australopithecus. ("Southern Ape") There are several known types and the exact lineage is still being argued. The known family tree is:

Australopithecus afarenis "Southern Ape of Afar" This is the species "Lucy" belongs to.  Brain size is about 410cc, they stood between 3 and 4 feet and weighed about 65 pounds. They went extinct about 2.5 million years ago.

Australopithecus africanus "Southern Ape of Africa" Probably evolved from Australopithecus afarenis and lived 3 to 1 million years ago. Brain size was about the same as a gorilla's and they stood between 3 and 4 feet tall. Weight was about 45 to 90 pounds.

Australopithecus robustis "Robust Southern Ape" This species is larger then Australopithecus africanus , 4 feet 11 inches and 5 feet 7 inches, and weighed 110-154 pounds. Brain size is put at 500cc. This group lived 2.5 million to 1.5 million years ago. There is argument that robustis was the male of the afarenis or africanus species.

Australopithecus boisei "Bosie Southern Ape" boisei is named after one Charles Boise and supporter of fossil hunts. The original name was Zinjanthropus "East Africa man" The species lived 2.5 to 1 million years ago. Height was between 5 feet 3 inches to 5 feet 10 inches. Weight was between 132 and 176 pounds. Brain size was about 500cc.  boisei is nicknamed "Nutcracker man" due to its large jaw and massive grinding teeth. However, examination has shown that it could chew no harder then us and it's diet seems to have primarily been of leaves.

Homo habilis "Handy man" This is reported to be the first known species of the genus Homo. The brain is larger the Australopithecus, 650-800cc compared to 500cc, the arms shorter, and hip bones that facilitated bipedal walking. Body size was reduced from boisei and robustis, back to between four and five feet. Weight is put at 110 pounds. The species is dated at 2.5 to 1.5 million years ago. Habilis was a throw back in that the head had not changed with the rest of the body. It still retained the brow ridges, jaws and nose of the Australopithecus. In fact, some discoveries were so labeled.

Homo erectus "Upright Man") was the first hominid to leave Africa. His existence dates from 1.6 million years ago to perhaps 200,000 years ago. However, recent discovers have suggested that isolated populations may have existed even later.

Brain size is put at 850cc, height up to 6 feet and weight was comparable to modern humans.

Early discoveries of Homo Eretus remains were variously named Peking Man, Java Man and Heidelberg Man. His range was all of Africa, most of Europe and as far east as China. Sites in California have been suggested as containing Homo erectus finds. No one had satisfactorily explained how the vast distance from China to California was crossed. Recently a small sample the population of China was tested to determine their DNA. The theory tested was that man developed in Africa, spread out and then further developed in China. What was found suggested that waves of hominids came out of Africa, each developed the race further. The idea how having man develop in several regions and not just Africa has supporters as does the "out of Africa" theory.

Homo sapiens neanderthalenis "Man from the Neander Valley" This species is today considered a "dead end," someone that did not give rise to Homo sapiens sapiens. The latest support has come from DNA analysis of his bones. They don't match with Homo sapiens sapiens. In other words, humans did not develop fro the Neandertals. Neandertals are larger in body then modern humans with massive bones. They have short, compact bodies, with large joints and hands. The body shape suggests they were well adapted to cold environments. They are dated between 200,000 to 30,000 years ago. In some sites (the Middle East at Jebel Irhoud, Tabun, and Skhul) the two species (Homo sapiens, and Homo sapiens neanderthalenis) lived near each other. It has been suggested that an archaic Homo sapiens gave rise to the species. They had to date been found only in Europe and the Middle East. It has been suggested that while the species was successful, they may have a a lower birth rate then the early humans. Given only a 2% lower rate per generation would lead to extenuation.

Homo sapiens "Man who thinks" The archaic form is dated between 500,000 and 150,000 years ago. Brain size is about 1200cc. The species shows  links and the characteristic of Homo erectus.

Homo sapiens sapiens Modern man. The first know group appears some 40,000 years ago during the Neolithic period. However, new finds are pushing that date back.

Evolution has been demonstrated through selective breeding, deep ocean core samples, fossils and the known history of life on the planet. That's just a few of the sources.

The best site to learn about evolution is:

National Academy of Sciences: (Guidebook on Evolution)

http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/evo...

To quote from this source:



"Evolution in the broadest sense explains that what we see today is different from what existed in the past. Galaxies, stars, the solar system, and earth have changed through time, and so has life on earth.

Biological evolution concerns changes in living things during the history of life on earth. It explains that living things share common ancestors. Over time, evolutionary change gives rise to new species. Darwin called this process "descent with modification," and it remains a good definition of biological evolution today."

http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/evo...

"Is evolution a fact or a theory?

The theory of evolution explains how life on earth has changed. In scientific terms, "theory" does not mean "guess" or "hunch" as it does in everyday usage. Scientific theories are explanations of natural phenomena built up logically from testable observations and hypotheses. Biological evolution is the best scientific explanation we have for the enormous range of observations about the living world.

Scientists most often use the word "fact" to describe an observation. But scientists can also use fact to mean something that has been tested or observed so many times that there is no longer a compelling reason to keep testing or looking for examples. The occurrence of evolution in this sense is a fact. Scientists no longer question whether descent with modification occurred because the evidence supporting the idea is so strong.

Why isn't evolution called a law?

Laws are generalizations that describe phenomena, whereas theories explain phenomena. For example, the laws of thermodynamics describe what will happen under certain circumstances; thermodynamics theories explain why these events occur.

Laws, like facts and theories, can change with better data. But theories do not develop into laws with the accumulation of evidence. Rather, theories are the goal of science."

http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/evo...

A common comment is that man "descended from the apes." Consider:

"If humans evolved from apes, why are there still apes?

Humans did not evolve from modern apes, but humans and modern apes shared a common ancestor, a species that no longer exists. Because we shared a recent common ancestor with chimpanzees and gorillas, we have many anatomical, genetic, biochemical, and even behavioral similarities with the African great apes. We are less similar to the Asian apes—orangutans and gibbons—and even less similar to monkeys, because we shared common ancestors with these groups in the more distant past.

Evolution is a branching or splitting process in which populations split off from one another and gradually become different. As the two groups become isolated from each other, they stop sharing genes, and eventually genetic differences increase until members of the groups can no longer interbreed. At this point, they have become separate species. Through time, these two species might give rise to new species, and so on through millennia."

http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/evo...

Finally for all those "The bible says..." I ask "What would Odin do?" See:

http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/myth...

Answer 7

This is the Conclusion I wrote for a paper on this topic I know it is long but I think it answers your question very well so please try to read all of it before you give me a thumb down:)

Science in effect has given us a tool to use in understanding why religion or God has set the rules in such a manner. Science is the answers to how God did such things.  Religion is not lost by science, but supported. Science is never a beginning, but a means. Science will never answer a question without asking another. True, science has become a way of life but not one that clashes with the teachings of religion. To support this I would like to dissect some current problems the world faces. Take evolution and creationism for an example. Evolution is not a beginning but a middle. Evolution would suggest that something is evolving and would it not have to exist before hand in order to evolve.  Evolution is not a practical or provable theory for the creation of life, but more so of how it has changed while existing. In Geniuses the bible claims that animals were created before man, is it beyond reason to think that the resulting power of God creating man was what we call evolution? This line of thought does not support creationism in the classroom, which is in fact a violation of church and state, however it does support that they can co-exist and that evolution is not an attempt to discredit creationism but a means to a possible explanation of it.

Consider also the split of science and religion over environmental issues. On the religious side people are saying that we must preserve what we have been given and take care of it, on the secular side is the use of resources to our full advantage. Like evolution this is not a true dividing line between science and religion. Sciences has given use a means to an easier life, for example cars and manufacturing of fossil fuels. Science also shows that the use of these may also be causing global warming. Indeed we only use these fuels because of technology resulting from science thus supporting the religious conservation ideal. That being said I know of few if any people, including myself, that are willing to park their cars for good.  It would be unreasonable to prepare the government and economy for such a change and the likely hood of surviving would be low. Ergo our solution to the problem can only rest in understanding it as much as we can and taking reasonable steps supported by science. My point is that science is not the cause of the problem rather the misuse of it.

In conclusion I would like to leave this thought for all readers, religious or not. What if you could, in some degree, measure the energy of God? Would science give it the label of the “energy of God“, I highly doubt it but a “rose by any other name” is still a rose. The salvation of my soul rests with God but the salvation of the physical body and natural word rests with us and our understanding of them through science.

Answer 8

did you see the scull they found in china recently?predates any bible ive ever seen or heard about.the shells obveously came from a masive shift in the earth or flood we may see another one soon who knows?

Answer 9

I should disregard thousands - nay millions of learned people doing research so I I can blindly believe a bunch of illiterate desert nomads who just happened to write a book 2k years ago?

Gaaaad. What a moron.

Answer 10

It's a theory, that's all.

Answer 11

Evolution is a speculation of how man MAY have progressed and since it is the only viable theory Science stands by it. The theory that man was designed by divinity is just a bit hard to prove but then again so is evolution. To believe in either one must have Faith that proof is irrelevant. Believe what you choose and let others do the same it is less stressful that way.

Answer 12

I'm not going to get into Who came first or What .........As far as seashells on top of Mt. Everest --I guess that Teutonic plates pushing against each other to form the mountains ---dosen't have anything to do with it  At one time the top of Everest ....WAS the bottom of the ocean

Answer 13

there is much more evidence of evolution that there is of god. and the bible does not count as evidence of god, because you cannot use the book in question as proof that itself is proof of god