Feminists have a chance to elect a woman as the VP, will they ?

Question

What is more important to feminists, liberalism or promoting women in general? Will they help elect a woman to the second most powerful office in the nation? Or would they prefer not to so they can cling to liberalism and victim hood? Is this change they can deal with? Or does the boys club get their vote?

Answer 1

Voting for her just because she's a woman is about the most sexist thing you can do. It's pretty much like saying "Any woman will do, they're all the same".

Answer 2

The feminists will never elect a woman that does not support their beliefs and Palin does not.  Hillary earned their respect, but Palin expects it for free.

Her being picked was a great disrespect to most women that earned their positions and rights.  She would set them back 25 years or more.  She believes in outlawing abortions even if the women were raped.  I don't believe in abortion, but as a man, I believe we shouldn't be able to tell a woman what to do.

Answer 3

I think women still want rights

Answer 4

Feminists may not, but us real women will!  Just because Palin is anti-abortion does not put her back in the dark ages of women's rights.  That is a totally ridiculous thing to even think.  I think this has been a brilliant decision on the part of the Republican party.  They can say she has little experience....so does Obama.  They can say people may vote just because she is a woman...so will people vote for Obama just because he is black.  I am so excited about this choice and will be at the polls to put an experienced man in as president and a woman as VP...

Answer 5

Why would I vote for someone who is my ideological opposite just because she is a woman?  That would be silly.

Answer 6

Your question is so obviously contrived.  What are you 10 years old or so freaking clueless that you have nothing better to do tonight?  

Answer 7

well she's a change isn't she! Isn't that what you demos wanted.. But I guess Obama is just talk about all the change and new stuff because he didn't have the ba--s to put a woman on his ticket that's why we should vote GOP not because Palin is female but because Obama doesn't have the ba--s to practice what he preaches.. Change/new

Answer 8

Um, just because she's a woman does not mean she's good for WOMEN plural. She's openly and unapologetically anti-woman. She will institute policies that will harm women.

So, no, I hope, in fact, that they do not elect the woman VP.

Answer 9

I think it a slap in the face of women

Answer 10

At this point I think we will just have to wait and see what they do. Personally, I think they like being controlled by men. They just like to complain about it.

Answer 11

Feminists in general are not to bright or else if they were truly feminists they would see that to elect ABM is simply the same old boy's club no change at all , but to elect a woman that would truly be change and say that at long last women are equal with the men in this country and deserve the same as men in wages and all else but more than likely they will not they will fall for the media propaganda and it will be the man's world again the only difference it will be black instead of white  

Answer 12

Labels aside...........If Obama becomes our president, he will dismantle our military, restrict our right to bear arms, create give-away programs so people will become more dependent, and raise our taxes to support his pet projects - like his $874 Billion/Yr. Global Poverty Act - sending all those tax dollars to the United Nations for WORLD distribution, but not one thin dime to remain in our own country.

Do the math.

Answer 13

There has never been a time when feminists supported or represented me as a woman.

They are only interested in their special-interest agenda, which involves removing opportunities for women to choose to remain home with their family, thereby separating them from their children and (even better) from their husbands.

Liberalism isn't even their agenda. Self-serving selfishness is all they are about.