Fight against Infant Mortality and Climate Changes?

Question

-The right to healt is a fundamental human right.

what can be done in order that the economic interests of pharmaceutical multinational companies are consistent with the individual's right to health and the fight against infant mortality?

-Climate Changes and the related issues depend crucially upon standards of behaviour and lifestyles which have a negative impact on the environment.

what individual as well as communal attitudes should be promoted to contrast this phenomenon?

Could you please try to answer seriousy these two questions telling what you think or what other people say?

thank you in advance :) (it's for a MUN, a simulation of ONU general assembly done in my school, I'm a delegate for an African country, Somalia I think.)

Answer 1

To help decrease population without abortions they should limit a family for the next couple of generations to at least 2 children and then tie the mother's tubes. Also, my suggestion to global warming they should stop burning fossil fuels and use solar energy or wind energy. Eventually, non-renewable resources will run low and we won't use coal or oil anymore in about 30 years from now. I don't like global warming because so many animals are endangered and it can put us in danger.

Answer 2

Climate change is just a smoke screen set up by the goverment, which the newspaper like to report on because it sells papers, there isn't any proof of climate change due to the human population, we have had climate change for millions of years and dinosuars didn't drive cars or build power stations and they definatley didn't use Deoderants or aerosols

Answer 3

There is no real evidence of climate change. The cycles occur every few million years and nothing is going to stop it.

Answer 4

Health must be prolonged by the pharmaceutical companies without its operations being a menace to the environment by adopting machines without the use of excessive pollutants.

Answer 5

The first part of your question is very important as it involves the very existance of our spices, I think this is in the hands of government, as it's their departements that control what is allowed from manufacture to market, and with the governments we have this isn't working, as big Pharm and the rest just through money at any problem they have at marketing their products, so we end up with poison in our food.  The second part, well they used to call it 'Global Warming', but they know it's they are wrong, so have changed to global change, which is more correct as weather changes all the time, so now they can't be wrong, we know the globe is warming, but so are the other planets in our solar system, that's why the ice is melting on them ALL.

Answer 6

We can start by allowing women in underdeveloped countries access to birth control.  Too many catholic aid charities are giving out aid on the condition that the people follow catholic doctrine.  And that's not good for the economy (an increase in population = a decrease in GDP).