Football or hocket???

Question

Which sport do you think is more aggressive in their physical contact???

Football or Hockey???

Answer 1

i think hocket is more aggressive for the simple fact that they let you fight, and anybody can get hit at any time rather you have the puck or not  

Answer 2

hockey

Answer 3

football

tackles

yellow cards

red cards

injuries

Answer 4

Not even close...hockey! In footbal you huddle up and stand around waiting for that 4 second burst of excitement when you can pound one another, in hockey you can go like mad for 45 seconds and expect to possibly take a beating for several of those seconds. Plus you do it on blades which means guys can build up a lot of speed before they drill you (in football you are within bad breathe reach of the guy you plan on hitting so full speed hitting doesnt happen nearly as often). Football players have more pads, dont need to worry about sticks or elbows to an exposed head or a frozen peice of rubber drilling them at nearly 100 mph. They also dont have to play 82 times just to make the playoffs or play back to back games or worry about a fistfight.

Dont get me wrong....football is a brutal sport and you take a beating but the speed of hockey and the shear amount of actually playing time make hockey a more overall physical and aggressive game. Played both through high school (still play an occassional hockey game) and have hurt like h**l playing both but I know from experience hockey is the more physically demanding and aggressive game. But playing football isnt easy or for the weak.

Answer 5

Football all the way but Hockey its pretty phsical but Football everytime theres a play you have to taclke them and run