Frictional unemployment may be economically beneficial if:?

Question

Frictional unemployment may be economically beneficial if:

A. its psychological costs are borne only by the unemployed worker.

B. losses in economic output are small.

C. it leads to a better match between worker and job.

D. the social costs are limited to smaller tax revenues collected.

E. few job skills are lost while unemployed.

Answer 1

C. it leads to a better match between worker and job.

Answer 2

Ans:  it leads to a better match between worker and job.

Frictional unemployment involves people in the midst of transiting between jobs, searching for new ones; it is compatible with full employment. It is sometimes called search unemployment and can be voluntary. New entrants (such as graduating students) and re-entrants (such as former homemakers) can also suffer a spell of frictional unemployment.

Frictional unemployment exists because both jobs and workers are heterogeneous, and a mismatch can result between the characteristics of supply and demand. Such a mismatch can be related to skills, payment, worktime, location, attitude, taste, and a multitude of other factors. Workers as well as employers accept a certain level of imperfection, risk or compromise, but usually not right away; they will invest some time and effort to find a better match. This is in fact beneficial to the economy since it results in a better allocation of resources. However, if the search takes too long and mismatches are too frequent, the economy suffers, since some work will not get done. Therefore, governments will seek ways to reduce unnecessary frictional unemployment.

Policies to reduce frictional unemployment include:

* educational advice;

* schooling and training facilities;

* information on available jobs and workers;

* combating prejudice (against certain workers, jobs or locations);

* incentives and regulations (e.g. when the frictionally unemployed receive benefits);

* relocation of industries and services;

* facilities to increase availability and flexibility (e.g. daycare centers);

* aid or grants to overcome a specific obstacle (e.g. if a handicapped worker is employed);

* reduction of the gap between gross and net wages (e.g. by taxing consumption instead).

Frictional unemployment coincides with an equal number of vacancies. Numerically, it is therefore maximal when the labour market is in equilibrium. When for instance demand far exceeds supply, the frictionally unemployed will be few as they will get many job offers.

One kind of frictional unemployment is called wait unemployment: it refers to the effects of the existence of some sectors where employed workers are paid more than the market-clearing equilibrium wage. Not only does this restrict the amount of employment in the high-wage sector, but it attracts workers from other sectors who wait to try to get jobs there. The main problem with this theory is that such workers will likely "wait" while having jobs, so that they are not counted as unemployed. In Hollywood, for example, those who are waiting for acting jobs also wait on tables in restaurants for pay (while acting in "Equity Waiver" plays at night for no pay). However, these workers might be seen as underemployed .

Another type of frictional unemployment is seasonal unemployment, where specific industries or occupations are characterized by seasonal work which may lead to unemployment. Examples include workers employed during farm harvest times or those working Winter jobs on the ski slopes or Summer jobs such as life-guarding at outdoor pools and agricultural labor.