GW activists already have a plan?

Question

http://www.enn.com/press_releases/2511

Suck all the co2 and bury it.

Answer 1

No, judging by the title they don't already have a plan -- "International Partnership EVALUATES FEASIBILITY of . . . "

Answer 2

The actual plan is to suck all the money out of Western democracies and transfer it to Eastern communist dictatorships.

Answer 3

theres nothing new or unproven about this.

statol Norway's national oil company has been pumping 2800 tons of co2 into formations under the north sea EVERY DAY FOR12 YEARS NOW (one million tons per year)they started in 1996 & have been running smoothly ever since with no problems whatsoever.

the alarmists try to cover it up because they dont want to admit there is an easy industrial solution to their imagined problem.

an easy industrial solution would short circuit their political agenda.

Answer 4

Wait a minute......what the idea is;

pump CO2 from containers and or the air into the ground.

What if a class 5 volcano explodes or, lord forbid a super volcano, which could potential release billions of trillions tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. Yellow Stone National Park is a super volcano which we have geologically documented the history of its eruption, it is the reason of our fertile plains. While the eruptions haven't been consistent, on a geological average WE ARE OVER DUE.

   An eruption of this magnitude will start the "green house" phenomenon, and all society will be in chaos. This effect will last for years.

A little more than 1 degree change in the past 100 years is nothing to be alarmed about.

Answer 5

"Spectra Energy will drill two test wells to determine whether the surrounding geology is suitable for the permanent storage of CO2 and hydrogen sulfide (H2S). These compounds are present in the raw natural gas produced in the area and removed during processing at the company’s Fort Nelson gas plant. "

The project is to dispose of waste gases their processing produces, that they might otherwise have to pay a penalty for the release of.

This test will not create a "solution" to the broader issue of disposing of past, curent or future CO2 releases from other sources.  It could provide interesting validation of whether or not sequestration in general will be effective or permanent.  We certainly can't make any assumptions on that at this time.