Gerrry McCann-why does he ignore the evidence of the cadaver dogs?

Question

Lowjoy -Tis sad that you have to answer a question with a question -the readers would like an answer.

Pinball - I didn't ask if they were innocent, i asked if there was any evidence for an abductor.So far not one shred -but plenty of evidence to the contrary.Not enough to convict though.

Answer 1

Are you serious or is question just a windup? I suggest you move on and leave detective work to the experts.

Answer 2

I hear very little evidence put forward of an abduction by the McCanns.

Answer 3

sadly there is no evidence

i wish there was as then there would be hope

Answer 4

do you block everyone who disagrees with your opinions?

Answer 5

I agree with you Rose 1 but surely the most valuable thing they left in the apartment that night were their three beautiful children

Answer 6

St Gerry and The Mother of The year must be absolutely crapping themselves by now !

Answer 7

All the people who answer all about the McCanns, and their ideas on what has happened, I would like to know on what evidence you judge all of this speculation, You seem to know more than anyone, ... can you give any answers to this. ??

Answer 8

The mccann's have always tired to disclaim the dogs findings and the cadaver scent cause it's convenient for them to push "the abduction story'.  If the public believes Madeleine is alive, funds will continue to pour in and they will have the publics sympathy.

A reporter with enough ***** should ask the McCann's or Clarence Mitchell 'if the Mccann's are sure Madeleine is alive, why did they bring in Daniel Kreugel in the early days '''?.

It is very sad that these people are free and the scientific facts in this investigation has been swpet under the carpet and no one is questioning why?.

Madeleine's disapperance will remain a mystery hoepfully until someone somewhere, someday will have the ***** to speak the truth.

Answer 9

There is no evidence. Which seems strange that somehow this 'dark and mysterious stranger' was able to abduct a child and no-one saw a thing .........

But they'll keep peddling the myth to try and win favour with the public. But we all know what REALLY happened.

RIP Madeleine. You deserved justice, but sadly you arent going to get it.

Answer 10

At best they are guilty of negligence and are therefore not fit to be parents and at worst they are somehow connected to their daughter's disappearance.

As a result of their daughter's disappearance, they travelled the world and became instant celebrity's and even met the Pope.

Answer 11

if there was any evidence proving guilt on the part of the mccanns , they would have been  arrested by now. strangely enough, they havent been. need i say more?

thanks for unblocking me

Answer 12

He ignores the evidence of the dogs cos it doesn't support his theory!!

They are trained to high specifications and I doubt if they made an error. Kate McCann's excuse was that she is a doctor and deals with death all the time? What she handles the deceased herself? I doubt that. I don't know, does the smell of death linger on the person who handles the body even after ages??? If that is the case, what about murderers who happen to work with the dead, is that not a perfect cover up for a crime??

Abductor, there is no evidence to suggest someone broke in, or even went in through the door that the McCann's left open?? It beats me why they did that anyway!!! Surely they had their valuables in the apartment when they went to eat, apart from someone breaking in to steal, their kids could have wandered outside and injured themselves, Any parent would consider the child's safety at all times wouldn't they?? This stinks, and Gerry and Kate stink too.......of something very sinister. The dogs know it, and some of us know it too. Those that choose to ignore the signs like Gerry McCann are short sighted.