Girls only please, is it fair to give a guy a warning before hitting him in the groin? why or why not?

Question

Girls only please, is it fair to give a guy a warning before hitting him in the groin? why or why not?

Answer 1

The only reason why I would hit a guy in the groin is if he did something to REALLY upset me, like try to attack me or something along those lines. Why would I bother warning him if the jerk had it coming?

Answer 2

no warning,  he will run a mile if your going to tell him what you are going to do

Answer 3

Why would you want to hit him in the first place?

If you do end up hitting without a warning, it will be a very unpleasant sight...

Answer 4

Pearl Harbor, sneak attack.

I can't think of any real need to crack a guy in the pills, but if you're going to I suppose you might as well let it be a surprise.  Like Christmas, only with a lot of pain and none of that good feeling for the recipient.

Answer 5

Well, if you gave him fair warning, he would block the hit, and that would sort of defeat the purpose.

A better question might be, "Is it fair to be socked in the gut after hitting a man in the groin?"  And the answer to that would be "yes".  

Don't hit without being expected to deservingly be hit back.

Answer 6

You should never hit a man unless it's in self defense.

Answer 7

The only reason to hit someone anywhere is to protect yourself, and if that's the case, then he doesn't deserve a warning first.

Answer 8

Hitting a guy in the groin is pretty unfair to begin with. There's a reason that the phrase "below the belt" is typically used to describe unacceptable behavior or insults.

If you've already decided to be so mean to a guy, what's the point in giving him a warning that you're going to do it? You'll just anger him even more, because he'll know it was premeditated instead of impulsive.