Global Warming. Is there Really People Stupid enought to Ignore it?

Question

Seriously, the facts are undeniable. More CO2 exactly when Temperatures rise. More CO2 than ever recorded in the past 10,000,000 years. Gasoline Burned Chemically = CO2. Scientifically proven that CO2 = More Heat Trapped. Highest Temperatures in Recorded Human History. Yeah, beat that motha lickas.

Answer 1

yeah, think about that the next time you flip on your computer.

Answer 2

yes dude!!!!

Answer 3

Whoa hold on there chicken little I don't think the sky is falling.

Excerpts reprinted with permission from Tom Gremillion

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

            Global warming is a hoax, invented in 1988, that combines old myths including limits to growth, sustainability, the population growth time bomb, the depletion of resources, pollution, anti-Americanism and anti-corporate sentiment and, of all things, fear of an ice age. Those that espoused and supported the old myths have joined forced into a new group called “Environmentalists.”

Most environmentalists have no technical or scientific credentials whatsoever. What they have are major news outlets ready and willing to publicize their every utterance regardless of whether or not they are backed up by scientific proof. Atmospheric science requires highly technical knowledge and skills, not possessed by the vast majority of the so-called environmentalists, who yet feel qualified to demand that human activity subjugate itself to the whims of their new deity, Mother Nature.

Environmentalists claim that the Earth’s atmosphere is getting hotter. They claim that the polar icecaps and glaciers will melt and sea levels will rise over two hundred feet, flooding most coastal cities. They claim that many areas of the Earth will turn into deserts. They make all these claims but cannot substantiate them with real scientific evidence. Parts of the polar icecap and glaciers are melting but other areas of the polar icecaps and glaciers are thickening. The environmentalists base their “proof” of the existence of global warming on the melting areas but are strangely silent, even militant to the point of violence, if anyone mentions the areas that are thickening, and those thickening areas are many.

In the past, there have been many times when the global mean temperatures were warmer, sometimes much warmer and colder, much colder than they are now. Global mean temperatures are cyclical with the seasons but also with other normal cycles, as they have been for the entire history of the Earth. Scientific data from ice cores, tree rings and other indicators of global mean temperatures prove this. Human activity has never been the cause of these global temperature swings as the “global warming” advocates claim. If human activity was the cause, where were the SUVs, the power plants and industries in our historical past? They did not exist. If human activity was not the cause of these global temperature swings, what was?

The energy output of the Sun is far greater in one second than human activity could produce in a million years. The Earth rotates around the Sun. Its orbit is slightly elliptical. The energy reaching the Earth from the Sun varies slightly as the distance from the Sun to the Earth varies due to its elliptical orbit. The Sun activity increases and decreases with fluctuations in the solar flares emitted by the Sun. Differences in these fluctuation rates cause increases and decreases of solar energy hitting the Earth. This causes fluctuations in the global mean temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere.

In 2004, the energy from massive solar flares bombarded the Earth with solar energy. This solar energy caused heating of the Earth’s surface and atmosphere. Most of the energy of the solar flare eruptions dissipated into space. The amounts of energy ejected were massive, much greater than normal. Had the Earth received a full blast of the solar energy from one of the numerous flare eruptions in 2004, the consequences to life on Earth could have been disastrous. The higher than usual amounts of energy that struck the Earth’s atmosphere did have their effects, however, including some heating of the atmosphere.

Then there is the eruption of volcanoes, such as Mt. St. Helens, ejecting dust and ash into the Earth’s atmosphere. The amount of dust and ash in the atmosphere varies the amount of energy that can cause heating or cooling of the Earth’s atmosphere. Volcanoes also eject the kind of compounds that environmentalists call greenhouse gases. A single eruption the size of the Mt. St. Helens eruption released more of these gases, dust and ash into the atmosphere than all such emissions by human activity since the beginning of recorded human history. And there are numerous volcanic eruptions yearly.

The oceans are also a major source of greenhouse gases, as are trees. Trees and other vegetation take in carbon dioxide and give off other gases such as methane, a major greenhouse gas, and a host of other compounds, many of which are also greenhouse gases. Decaying vegetation also gives off methane gas. Studies of smog in the Los Angeles basin indicate that over 90% of the smog is generated by the vegetation in the area. To aid in perpetuating the hoax, however, environmentalists, aided by major news media outlets, censored and suppressed this study.

Studies have shown that greenhouse gases produced by human activity accounts for around 1 percent of the gases in the atmosphere. The total elimination of human generated greenhouse gases would have a negligible effect on Earth’s global mean atmospheric temperatures. The elimination of all U.S. gasoline powered vehicles would reduce worldwide “greenhouse” emissions by less than 0.2%.” What would be the effect on global mean temperatures? None. Doubling of manmade greenhouse emissions above current levels would increase the global mean temperature by one degree Centigrade, which is within the normal range of temperature swings.

It is the fluctuations of the Earth’s orbit around the sun, volcanic eruptions, the emission of gases by oceans and trees, all natural occurrences, that cause rises and declines in global mean temperatures, i.e., “global warming” and “global cooling,” not human activity.

Satellite data taken over the past 25 years indicate no surface or atmospheric warming. If anything there has been a very slight cooling, on the order of 0.01 degree Centigrade.

Recently, astronomers have noticed a thinning of the polar icecaps on Mars.

Is this “global warming, Mars style” and do Martian SUVs, power plants, and industries cause it? Hardly, but the “environmentalists” think so. Some even blame it on us here on Earth.

Global warming IS a hoax. Those claiming that “global warming” is real have an agenda other than saving the planet from human activity.

Answer 4

i don't like the environment, its my children's children's problem.

Answer 5

the problem isn't whether or not the planet is experiencing climate change because it undeniably is and has often over the millions of years since its birth, the problem is whether or not the current changes are being caused by man's influence...earth went through dramatic changes way before man ever existed, and has experienced similar shifts since man came along but before the age of industrialization...some people believe that what we are seeing now would happen if man was not a factor, and worry that all the convolutions being attempted to lessen man's influence are an incredible waste of time and potentially more harmful to the human condition by hampering global economies than they are beneficial by assisting the environment...and, next time you call people stupid please use proper English..."ARE there really people..." not "IS there really people..."

Answer 6

i ignore it. ignorance is bliss. im an easygoing person.

Answer 7

With people like you...is why I take stock in the tin foil business.

Answer 8

yes they are commonly known as republicans

Answer 9

take a glance toward washington,d.c. and you'll see lots of stupid people ignoring the fact.

Answer 10

you are wrong my dear! mot people think and know about global warming and its effects, but we are so busy in our daily life, therefore we have not enough time to watering the plants and care for them. our population is increasing to fast, this is also make a bad effect on our environment. think of your daily life. we don't care for our surrounding, you will see that many people use pollythine,million of people uses cars and bikes. we know that petroleum is not a renewable source of energy, but we can't stop it use. that's why global warming comes before us as a major problem.

Answer 11

I'm amazed that people actually believe it.  The amount of co2 added in the air is just one (1) molecule of co2 per million other molecules of air per year.

Answer 12

The science surrounding greenhouse effect is still slightly grey, particularly when you're talking anthropogenic.

There's no reason not to act though. Guess there's too many ignorant people who like to breathe in smog and low-level ozone.

Answer 13

I'm with you on this one. It amazes me how people don't want to pay attention to the facts. They don't want to have to give up something of theirs in order to help our planet. It's called being selfish and I feel sorry for them.

Answer 14

We've just finished Earth Hour in northern Australia and I was the only person on the street with my lights off. I took the dogs for a walk along the beach and people I spoke to didn't know about Earth Hour - and it was started in Australia!   I guess the messages aren't really hitting home.  What can be done?

Answer 15

You need to learn how to speak english properly and learn something about science.  

In the past, the temperature has risen, then the CO2 has risen then the temperature drops again - CO2 levels correspond with cooling more than warming.  

Scientifically proven that more CO2 = more heat trapped is true the same way that it is proven that spitting in the ocean causes the sea level to rise.  

You believe what you want to believe - but it's not science.

Answer 16

Are there really people stupid enough? Jackpot dude, you've come to the right place to find them all. There's one born every minute and they will end up here on this message board.

Answer 17

Ok, from what I hear the atmosphere is 95% water vapor and only almost 5% is carbon dioxide. So, we don't have enough man made greenhouse gasses to cause some real changes. I bet you didn't know this because of your liberal school. "Who is stupid enough to ignore it?", maybe your stupid enough not to know the science/politics about global warming. Or do you? I know it.

Answer 18

It is not just oil burning that makes CO2. Every thing that burns produces CO2. God put plants here a long time ago to take care of the CO2.  ,and that is where our present fossil fuels came from. It is not from fossil animals but fossil plants.The plants take in the CO2 and give us back the oxygen ,but the plants keep the C for there food. The more CO2 the better the plant life is.

Answer 19

Open the links below showing the past temperatures in the Vostok ice cores and tell me if you think the current warm period is unusually warm.

The "facts" you refer to are speculation at best.

If CO2 is the main driver of climate, why are global temperatures decreasing while CO2 levels are increasing?

http://www.socialtext.net/data/workspace...

http://www.socialtext.net/data/workspace...

Answer 20

They especially seem to proliferate during a full moon and despite common sense and logic, seem to shut off portions of their front lobe.

Answer 21

You are a genius, why are you so smart!

What a great question.

No one should be stupid enough to ingore how smart you are.

I think I love you.

Answer 22

oh yea u should see some of the people at my school

and just look at George Bush

Answer 23

That was some rage. Most of us are ignorant.

Answer 24

Regarding "Is there Really People Stupid enought to Ignore it?"

Not as many as are stupid enough to be suckered into believing it. If you did your research, you would see you are wrong.