Question:

Global Warming facts and info?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

I'm a senior in high school and our senior year is composed of a three stage research process. my chosen topic was biodiesel (fuel). i taught a class about how it worked and wrote a research paper comparing it to petroleum deisle in a number of standards. i learned a lot about pollution and the effects on the atmosphere. Also, my science class has been watching "An Inconvenient Truth" which is done by former wanna be president of the US Al Gore. The presentation is amazing. Theres so many factors being effected by the hazardous air pollution from humans. However, theres a lot of controversy on this subject. People say that the warming is natural and the CO2 levels are nothing to worry about becuase so many other natural events cause CO2 rises. If you think about it though, without humans, CO2 levels would be brought down again by plants and trees which use the CO2 for photosynthesis. It's just a lot to take in. Anybody have more facts to consider?

 Tags:

   Report

9 ANSWERS


  1. Here are some sites that you may find interesting. I'd like to see you prove them wrong? Eat this for breakfast.

    http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/

    http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/ar...

    http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/ar...

    http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/ar...

    http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/ar...

    http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_4387...

    http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/ar...

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/global...

    http://boortz.com/nuze/200702/02022007.h...

    JOHN COLEMAN

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Colema...

    http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eyj4vu2v3...

    FACTS, MYTHS, AND TESTS

    http://icecap.us/index.php/go/faqs-and-m...

    http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWa...

    http://www.isil.org/resources/fnn/2007ju...

    SINCE WHEN DO YOU TRUST A POLITICIAN? AL GORE

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VV309lbB...

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/edi...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=porvkJhSF...

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/...

    http://www.slate.com/id/2142319/

    MORE VIDEOS

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io-Tb7vTa...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvdyfl-hE...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5umFWkzWP...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RVp8Q6H9...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO9laiUXS...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xi1LU45Ni...

    WHAT ABOUT GLOBAL COOLING? IS/WAS THERE ANY SUCH THING?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cool...

    http://denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm

    SO WHY MAKE A FEW MOVIES AND WRITE A FEW BOOKS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING? IS THERE MORE TO IT? WHAT’S THE REAL REASON FOR WINNING A NOBEL PEACE PRIZE? THE REASON IS PROFIT WITH GLOBAL TAXES.

    http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/u...

    http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/gl...

    http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/rpt.glbl...

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news...

    http://mpinkeyes.wordpress.com/2007/12/1...

    http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/car...

    IF I’M RICH, CAN I GET AWAY WITH BEING THE BAD GUY?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_cred...

    http://texasholdemblogger.wordpress.com/...

    http://newsbusters.org/node/10989

    http://www.carboncreditkillers.com/defau...

    http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/21/cn...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FFdZBahx...

    http://www.carbonfund.org/site/pages/why...

    SO WHAT ABOUT ALL THOSE SCIENTISTS SUCH AS METEOROLOGISTS? WHAT DO THEY SAY?

    http://www.cnsnews.com/Culture/Archive/2...

    http://xtronics.com/reference/globalwarm...

    http://www.carolinajournal.com/opinions/...

    http://science.propeller.com/story/2007/...

    http://www.kltv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7...

    OK OK, THEN ARE THE ICE CAPS REALLY MELTING?

    http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Rapids...

    http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=128...

    http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/environm...

    WILL ALL THE POLAR BEARS REALLY DIE IN 25 YEARS?

    http://www.seaworld.org/infobooks/PolarB...

    http://online.wsj.com/public/article_pri...

    http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2006/05/1...

    WHAT ABOUT THE EXTREME WEATHER RECORDS?

    http://climate.virginia.edu/va_extremes....

    http://ggweather.com/climate/extremes_us...

    MISC. EDUCATION

    http://oceansjsu.com/105d/Readings/Seawa...

    http://www.gma.org/surfing/antarctica/an...

    http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2...

    http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/faq.html#14

    http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/oc...


  2. You might look at sources other than "Inconvenient truth" if you want to be informed.

    CO2 can be a hazard if it reaches 300,000 PPM - also note it is heavier and 'Sinks' to the ground when no wind.  This means that without wind it can only 'trap' heat at near ground level.

    http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/Hazards/What/V...

    "Carbon dioxide gas is heavier than air and the gas can flow into in low-lying areas; breathing air with more than 30% CO2 can quickly induce unconsciousness and cause death. In volcanic or other areas where CO2 emissions occur, it is important to avoid small depressions and low areas that might be CO2 traps. The boundary between air and lethal gas can be extremely sharp; even a single step upslope may be adequate to escape death."

    The oceans warming will release huge quantities of CO2 - FAR FAR beyond anything man could ever produce.

    http://www.iceagenow.com/Ocean_Warming.h...

    Man knows very little about the number of underwater volcanoes that exist under the oceans - or the amount of heat that can be released from within the earth causing CO2 levels to soar!.

    "Three million underwater volcanoes"  ? ? ?

    http://environment.newscientist.com/arti...

    This should be a priority for science to determine the amount of heat that could be generated from the earth's core into our oceans - driving ALL the earth's climate/weather.

    Of course the AGW fans will DENY this possibility and denounce any research that won't fit their agenda.

  3. One overwhelming fact that anti-carbon footprint people seem to not understand is we are digging up "stored CO2" form 100's of millions of years ago. This "storage" took place when the earth was a different world, (if you think the earth is 6k years old, then there is no helping you). The earth, much warmer and vegetation was lush and very large plus the land was moist and swampy, thus removing the CO2 from the atmosphere. Fast froward to about 2 million years or a little less and we have the appearance of the first hominids that evolved on a much cooler temperate planet. Come even closer to present time at about 25 thousand years ago (arguable about 200 to 100k when we first mastered fire) and humans start the race for the domination and ultimate

    destruction of earth. So basically we are no different today then our ancestors of that time who were at battle with nature and did not understand the world around them, so gods were invented to explain the unexplainable (sound familiar?).

  4. Global warming has been a serious issue in the past, causing major extinctions on the planet millions of years ago:

    http://www.killerinourmidst.com/P-T%20bo...

    "An even larger amount of carbon dioxide (CO¸2) would also have been expelled by Traps volcanism. But in contrast to the sulfate aerosols, carbon dioxide remains in the atmosphere for extended periods of time (centuries), though it decreases slowly over that interval. As a greenhouse gas, it warms the atmosphere, changing ecological conditions. (Deccan Traps volcanism, coming before the end of the Cretaceous, is estimated to have warmed the world by 3° to 5°C, or 5.4° to 9°F; Ravizza and Peucker-Ehrenbrink, 2003.) And because it combines chemically to form carbonic acid, it also produces mildly acidic rain. Acid rain can dissolve calcium carbonate shells, particularly those at or near the ocean surface.  Additionally, acid rain leaches vital nutrients from the soil, resulting in plant stunting and death."

    The progression in scientific understanding on the current global warming is summarized in detail on this site:

    http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.h...

    The scientific status at the moment is stongly in favor of the consensus as summarized in the IPCC report:

    http://norvig.com/oreskes.html

    "The consensus was quantified in a Science study by Prof. Naomi Oreskes (Dec. 2004) in which she surveyed 928 scientific journal articles that matched the search [global climate change] at the ISI Web of Science. Of these, according to Oreskes, 75% agreed with the consensus view (either implicitly or explicitly), 25% took no stand one way or the other, and none rejected the consensus."

    The controversy that you speak of may be entirely manufactured by industry investment of affected industries:

    Exxposing ExxonMobil's Agenda: Manipulating Politics and the Public

    http://www.exxposeexxon.com/facts/dailyf...

    Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/20...

    Here's an interesting collection of articles which discusses how the U.S. media uniquely supports the false appearance of controversy:

    http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/05...

    Here's more on the media's role:

    Journalistic Balance as Global Warming Bias

    Creating controversy where science finds consensus

    http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1978

    "A new study has found that when it comes to U.S. media coverage of global warming , superficial balance—telling "both" sides of the story—can actually be a form of informational bias."

    At Fox News, a Pundit for Hire

    http://www.freepress.net/news/print.php?...

    "Objective viewers long ago realized that Fox News has a political agenda. But, when a pundit promotes this agenda while on the take from corporations that benefit from it, then Fox News has gone one disturbing step further"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Mill...

    http://www.nowpublic.com/whos_paid_to_de...

  5. CO2 is not there . If the CO2 had increased as much as u want me to believe half the world would be dead. The lower alarm point for oxygen is 19.5% . Below this u would pass out . This should be happening in the lower vallies ,as CO2 is very heavy. CO2 is used to put out fires as it smothers the fire.

  6. Volcanoes!  They have an effect on Global warming.

    Plus there is nothing we can do to stop them from erupting.

    http://softpixel.com/eof/1998,9/volcanoe...

    Also what about forest fires?  How are we going to stop those? yes some are man made, but also many occur naturally.

    Yes the planet is warming up and yes we need to stop polluting and start planting more trees, but if we get in a frenzy about this and start freaking out is it really going to make any difference?

    Good luck on your project... I hope you get an A+!

  7. most people believe it  ment the world was  ending

  8. omg! thank you! another believer in the horrible effects of global warming which did not come only from volcanoes

  9. Other things to consider:

    1.  CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas.  We also have CF4 (byproduct of aluminum production), SF6 (used to insulate high-voltage equipment), N2O (emitted by bacteria as a byproduct of nitrate decomposition), methane and so forth.

    2.  Feedback of increased atmospheric H2O from rising CO2 has now been observed (can't find a link to the paper, sorry).

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 9 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.