Global Warming has its benefits?

Question

Dont you think by shrinking the ice flows dimentions its easier to pound those baby harp seals?

Answer 1

no you clown! global warming has no benefits! anyone with half a brain would know that! you know, just imagine if you were a polar animal and your home was destroyed by global warming! and guess what else, with all that melting ice, it's going to flood the earth! get a life.

Answer 2

Not worth answering!

Answer 3

The benefits also are humans agree on something for once. There could be a chance for world peace if they were to seize it. Human Right to peace in constitutions. Right to conserve resources own planet.

Answer 4

SICK!

Answer 5

Go die

Answer 6

Global warming is a mixed bag. It will favor some species over others (as during previous periods of global warming). But this will come at great cost. The Sahara has been expanding for years. Does anyone with any heart really want to see it consume all of Africa? The Aral Sea dried up, and  many other major bodies of water are also drying up. Water supports a lot of fish. Do you want to live on algae cakes and jellyfish?

Answer 7

I like it warm

Answer 8

no it  not because soon later the water pressure will go up

and it wont help at all because were destroy homes of animals

Answer 9

Unfortunately that's a myth being promoted by the oil industry.

http://www.fightglobalwarming.com/page.c...

MYTH - Global warming and extra CO2 will actually be beneficial — they reduce cold-related deaths and stimulate crop growth.

FACT - Any beneficial effects will be far outweighed by damage and disruption.

Even a warming in just the middle range of scientific projections would have devastating impacts on many sectors of the economy. Rising seas would inundate coastal communities, contaminate water supplies with salt and increase the risk of flooding by storm surge, affecting tens of millions of people globally. Moreover, extreme weather events, including heat waves, droughts and floods, are predicted to increase in frequency and intensity, causing loss of lives and property and throwing agriculture into turmoil.

Even though higher levels of CO2 can act as a plant fertilizer under some conditions, scientists now think that the "CO2 fertilization" effect on crops has been overstated; in natural ecosystems, the fertilization effect can diminish after a few years as plants acclimate. Furthermore, increased CO2 may benefit undesirable, weedy species more than desirable species.

Higher levels of CO2 have already caused ocean acidification, and scientists are warning of potentially devastating effects on marine life and fisheries. Moreover, higher levels of regional ozone (smog), a result of warmer temperatures, could worsen respiratory illnesses. Less developed countries and natural ecosystems may not have the capacity to adapt.

The notion that there will be regional “winners” and “losers” in global warming is based on a world-view from the 1950’s. We live in a global community. Never mind the moral implications — when an environmental catastrophe creates millions of refugees half-way around the world, Americans are affected.

Answer 10

Wow you're pretty retarded, come back when you actually have a logical question.

Answer 11

It creates more fresh water.

Answer 12

That sounds pretty mean. Correct me if I'm wrong, but are you saying that it's easier to kill the poor baby seals? I've seen images of that, and it's clearly sick.