Grand Slam or Masters Series?

Question

Which one do you think is lot harder to achieve, win back-to-back Masters series(e.g. win Rome then Hamburg) or win a Grand Slam?

Answer 1

its a lot harder to win a grand  slam..

Answer 2

To win A Grand Slam is a lot harder than winning back to back Masters Series.  At least Nalbandian is showing the difficulties of winning a Grand Slam but he already won back to back masters series last year. No offensive here.  But to complete all nine masters series is surely a lot harder than complete a "Grand Slam", at least in 18 years history of Masters Series, nobody has ever achieved it.  As there's already 2 player (Laver & Agassi) complete "Grand Slam" since Open Era (40 years).

Answer 3

Grand Slams would be alot harder as there is alot of pressure leading into one and everyone has dreamt of winning one.

Answer 4

master

Answer 5

Grand Slam. There are only four Grand Slams each year, and it's been ages since someone's won a boxed set (four in a row).

But back-to-back Master series titles doesn't sound easy, either.