Grizzly bear vs tiger?

Question

i think it would be the bear becuase it is lager and has more muscle

what do you think....

Answer 1

My money would be on the tiger. Though the grizzly bear, which is a subspecies of brown bear, can weigh more than tigers, most of their weight comes from their large, heavy skeletons and considerable amount of body-fat. By contrast, a tiger's skeleton is quite small given the size of the animal, and its body-fat is minimal - most of its weight comes from its enormous musculature. Tigers have evolved to hunt prey considerably larger than they are - they have to be immensely strong in order to bring down animals like water buffalo and gaur. They also have much larger canines than bears, and the shortened muzzle and large sagittal crest on the skull gives them more powerful jaws. Not to mention their eighteen razor-sharp claws (bears' claws are non-retractile, and therefore blunt from constant contact with the ground). Brown bears, on the other hand, are largely vegetarian. They will occasionally take meat, but it is usually either carrion or young, inexperienced animals that are easy to catch. Such prey is considerably smaller than they are, meaning they do not require as much strength to kill them. There are documented cases of Siberian tigers killing and eating brown bears.

Answer 2

Definitely the tiger. Check out this crazy video proving my answer to be best...

Answer 3

Probably the bear. They're surprisingly quick, and with all that muscle all a bear would need is one good bite on the tiger. Tigers usually hunt prey smaller than them, and charge at the animal so as to knock it down and kill it. Good luck knocking down a grizzly. A grizzly could snap a tiger's neck, so lets just keep them in seperate cages at the zoo, shall we? :)

Answer 4

neither a squirrell would whoop both their butts