Gypsies , "aryan race" and n**i anthropologists?

Question

I'm doing a research on gypsies , and i need to find infos about the concept of aryan race according to the n**i anthopologists. I want to demonstrate how those scientists misunderstood the term Aryan by connecting it to germanic population when it's actually about indo-iranic populations , and gypsies have indian origins .

Gypsies have been killed by n***s in concentration camps because of them being " not aryans" , but n***s where wrong . where can I find informations about this topic?

Answer 1

I think the whole deal with "Aryans" and "Semites" is with some archaeologists looking at different languages and styles of pottery spreading out from Iran 5000 years ago.

Apparently, the Aryan culture went north-west and south east from Iran, into Europe and India, whilst the Semitic culture (again as defined by language and pottery) went east into the middle east and Africa. This eastward migration of Semites is what is described in the bible when Abraham migrated from Mesopotamia to Palestine.

Today, almost all European languages are seen as being "Aryan" in origin, except that of the Basques in Spain and that of Finland, which originate from before the spread of the Aryan culture.

The only Semitic languages are Arabic and Hebrew, as all the rest have more or less disappeared.

I'm not sure where Gypsies fit into this. Aryan isn't really a race, except for the Persians (Iran is a different spelling of Aryan). Otherwise it's only about language and pottery. In fact, the difference between "Semites" and Aryans may be entirely fictional, they both came from almost exactly the same place (Western Iran and Northern Iran) at almost exactly the same time (five thousand years ago).

Answer 2

I drove down to my local tesco`s a couple of weeks ago,I could`nt get in to the car park because overnight it had become a gypsy camp....a week later I went down there and it looked like a bomb site...rubble every were,the trees had been knocked down..there was refuse and human sh it all over the place, the fences were down and they had even stolen the paving slabs from the pathways...I don't know what the n**i`s did to them but I know what I would like to do with the b******s.

Answer 3

Aryan means "noble."  In various forms it has been used by widely separated peoples.  Ireland and Iran both mean "land of the Aryans."

The original Aryan peoples were White peoples descended from Cro-Magnon and living in the region of the Ural and Caucasus Mountains, around the Caspian and Black Seas, in the place that is now dominated by the countries Russia and Ukraine.

The Aryans engaged in waves of migration, probably induced by population pressure, beginning perhaps more than 20,000 years ago.  Their tribes wandered eastward toward China and Kamchatka, southward into Persia and India, into the Middle East, and westward into Europe.

The Aryan migratory waves were often separated by centuries of time, which meant that later ones usually did not recognize the descendants of earlier ones as kinfolk, and so wars of conquest ensued.  That's how, for example, the Minoan civilization lost status to the Hellenic one.

The Persian civilization was Aryan.  The Indus Valley Civilization was Aryan.  And the Germanic tribes of central Europe, the Teutons, were also Aryans.  So Hitler was correct when he described Germans as part of the Aryan race.

I wish that I knew why everybody automatically assumes that the n***s were wrong in their racial views.  Everybody acknowledges that they were 40 years ahead of the rest of the industrial world in engineering.  They invented the jet engine, the rocket, the guided missile. NASA's early genius was provided by captured German scientists.  And yet, when we turn from physics to consider anthropology, suddenly these great minds are considered great fools.

Maybe that isn't correct.  Maybe our belief that we know better today is merely the result of continuous propaganda.  Maybe the n***s were right.  It stands to reason that a people so enormously accomplished in some sciences wouldn't suddenly become stupid in a particular science.

And if we can see that those who say that the n***s got it all wrong anthropologically have, themselves, a vested interest in alternate theories, such as "racial equality," then we must question whether our own views are the result of reasoned consideration or whether they were served to us as propaganda in the media and in the public schools.

Why is it that racial equality is always asserted, and never proved?  Do you know of ANY attempt to substantiate the theory of racial equality scientifically?  I'll bet not.  I certainly never have seen one.  It floats unsupported as some kind of cosmic default, which we must consider correct for "moral reasons," but is belief in a lie really ever moral?

Answer 4

Yeah...I never thought about it that way before, but it's pretty ironic isn't it? The Germans (from Nordic descent) were nowhere close to Aryan,(who originated in what is now called the Middle East). The gypsies, which the n***s  viewed as "impure" and inferior, migrated out of Indian region well after the Aryan invasion. There is a book, "The Chalice and the Blade" by Rhianne Aisler, that describes some of this.

Answer 5

The n**i anthopologists did not misunderstand. Hitler and his sick cohorts were masters of propaganda. They intentionaly wanted to link the German race with Mesopotamia, known as the cradel of knowledge of civilization. This area includes Iraq,Syria, and Iran. By distorting history in their favor they could perpetuate their bull.... about them being the superior race. The n**i's intended on exterminateing all other races and people on the face of the earth That includes Gypsies, Jews, blacks , Arab's etc. etc.! Thankfully he eventually was the one destroyed. There loads of imformation out ther about all this. Start with researching Hitler's propaganda machine and how he fooled a nation and the world.

Answer 6

I have a friend in Germany who is a gypsy asked him on your question and he confirmed your thought .Gypsies are Aryans .the real Aryan ethnic group .(as an anthropologist you must avoid the term race ,for in mankind there is on race ,by the way ,that is human being ,but various ethnic groups ).My friend told me that you have a in to days Romona a library .

Answer 7

Aryan is a word that carries so much baggage and has long since been discarded from any academic studies, so...

that said, there was also another question from months ago about blondness and blue or green eyes and racial origins.

First of all, there are many blonde Aborigines in Australasia among very dark-skinned peoples, and also in South Africa, also among dark-skinned people - not from inter-breeding with others, but from ancient times.

Blondness and light-colored eyes have nothing to do with racial characteristics, but skeletal build and skull formation does.

One lady wrote about her origins from Russia, citing her blondness and light eyes, and here the difference between the Slavs and the Nordics and the Germanic tribes are instructive.

The Germanic and Slavic tribes were heavily mixed with Hunnic and Mongol and other Asiatic peoples.

A tiny number of Nordics did go to the land of Rus in the Viking times, but certainly not enough to really affect the populations there.

The Celts and the Nordics were fair-skinned and light-eyed quite often and Benjamin Franklin even called the Swedes "swarthy", meaning darkish people.

The shorter build of the Germans, the round heads and so on, compared to the taller (the Norweigians are the tallest nation on Earth), remind of their inter-mixing with other Asiatic tribes, and that same roundish skull is also seen in half of the Nordics.

None of these terms are really scolarly, and yet remember that the Germans were called "The Huns", by the English in the two world wars due to their ancestral heritage.

Pushed Westward out of Asia by the Huns, the Gothic tribes, the Germanics, remained in Central Europe and had already been mixed with the other Asiatic tribes.

The Gypsies - named for the Egyptians although with no cultural or racial ties - are really named the Romani, and they originated in India.

All Europeans are origianlly from Central Asia and the Indo-European languages tell the story.

The Gypsies are certainly "Aryan", as are Ethiopians and Somalians, although they have darker skin.

There are so many physical types and so much inter-mixing that it's ludicrous to assume or to speak about any sort of "pure" racialness anywhere in Europe or Asia, though.

The invasions were constant throughout history.

What does it matter?

Vive les differences and the differences flow in everyone's veins - that should be a great point with which to start world peace.

Get over the coloring as any sort of racial proflling - coloring is meaningless to Anthropology.

Also, remember as in Mongrel dogs, mixing the races creates a better hybrid every time.

Answer 8

That's a toughie but there is tons of stuff on the web. Try some of the following links:

http://www.eugenics.net/papers/3rdreich....

http://www.eugenics-watch.com/roots/chap...

http://www.waragainsttheweak.com/offSite...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_eugeni...

http://www.holocaustforgotten.com/romgyp...

http://www.chgs.umn.edu/Histories__Narra...

http://www.geocities.com/~Patrin/porraim...

and good luck.