I’ve had the blood tests done (day 3 and day 21). I’ve had ultrasounds and an endometrial biopsy done. Everything came back normal. Husband had s***n analysis done, but came back with low count, low motility and low morphology. We’ve been trying for about 12 cycles. I am 33, hubby is 35.
I’ve had one episode of infection (maybe Gonnorhea) in my early 20’s from an old bf. I am not sure if it turned into a PID. I was treated immediately and my menses got a bit screwy afterwards (irregular bleeding). I was put on the pill for some years and have been off the pill for a year to TTC. Since coming off the pill, my menses have been very regular. The final testing my doctor said for me is to check my tubes for blockage. He suggested HSG or laparoscopy with dye. He said laparoscopy with dye is more comprehensive as it checks the tubes and see if there are adhesions outside the tube/ovaries, etc. He gave me the option to choose between HSG or laparoscopy with dye. Obviously, laparoscopy is more invasive and expensive. I am wondering if anyone with similar circumstances as me underwent a HSG or laparoscopy with dye or both and could offer me insight as to which one to proceed. Also, could my husband’s low sperm status really make it so hard for us to conceive? I read all the books out there, have been charting, using opks, etc. so we are bding at the right time taking account of his low sperm status.
Tags: