I had a massive hail storm hit my house (and cars) over the weekend. I contacted an area roofing company and they are telling me that there is definately damage (which I have seen) and they want me to sign a "contingincy contract" which basically says I agree to use them as my contactor and they will "negotiate" on my behalf with my insurance company to repair the roof at no cost to me less my deductible. This seems pretty straight forward.
HOWEVER, some say that I'd be better off simply getting estimates from 3 reputable contractors and then getting the insurance adjuster to look at the house and see what the insurance would be willing to pay. This way if the insurance company says, for example, that they'd cut me a check for $7000, but I can repair the roofs for $6000, then the $1000 is mine to keep. (Seems kind of dishonest, doesn't it?)
So my question, for those that have been through this experience, or work in the insurance (or roofing industry) is: Would I be better off to just sign this contract with a good company and know that it will be handled or take the time to meet with several contractors, the adjuster, with the hope of "pocketing" money as some say is likely to happen.
Tags: