Question:

Has Prince Charles' newly born stepgranddaughter got any claim to the throne?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Has Prince Charles' newly born stepgranddaughter got any claim to the throne?

 Tags:

   Report

17 ANSWERS


  1. No


  2. Not by virtue of the step-relationship, no.

    If she is a Protestant desendant of the Electress Sophia of Hanover, she has a claim in her own right (doubtful, but I'm all about technicality).  Of course, tons of people are ahead of her in line.

    Only the descendants of Sophia who are Protestant, and had not married a Roman Catholic, can succeed to the throne. Roman Catholics and those who marry Roman Catholics are barred from ascending the throne forever.

  3. None whatsoever.

  4. no you have to have a direct blood relationship to the royal family to have any claim to the english throne

  5. She has no claim through Charles' blood, because she isn't related to Charles by blood.  She would only have some distant claim if one of her parents currently is in line for succession, and I don't believe that is the case.

  6. You mean from Camilla, the Royal Dutchess of Quack???

    HAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    We have yet to learn!!

    lol@avatar.dmx

  7. For that Camilla's family tree has to be examined , as to how she links to royal linage and not as spare part

  8. Nope. If neither of her parents are British royal members, the child cannot claim the throne. Although her grandmother is a royal member (only by marriage) and is the future Princess Consort to Prince Charles of Wales, she will remain a commoner with no titles or styles.  She could become a princess or a lady depending if she marries into royalty, however, she still has no claim to the british throne, which are only reserved for princesses of the blood (daughters of a monarch).

    Although this newborn child is a commoner, she does have royal blood. She is a descent from King Charles II's  illegitimate son Charles Lennox, 1st Duke of Richmond. However, according to the line of succession, an illegitimate child does not have any claim to the throne, therefore, she remains a commoner just like both of her parents.

  9. No. Camilla, according to Queen Elizabeth, can never be Queen of England and she isn't even a Princess. Since her  title, The Duchess of Cornwall, is a courtesy title only, none of her decedents can ever lay claim to the throne of England.

  10. No.  Her grandmother, Camilla, is descended from nobility and it's possible she'd be really far down the list if anyone bothered to trace it; however, her father is Catholic and she, presumably, will be baptized and Catholics are specifically excluded from the throne.

  11. No.

    For the person who thinks Camilla's title, Duchess of Cornwall is only a courtesy, that's not quite accurate. Camilla is a princess by virtue of her marriage the heir to the throne. She is smart enough not to have become Princess of Wales, the title to which she is rightly allowed. In deference to public opinion, she opted for Duchess of Cornwall. When Charles becomes King, she will be his Queen, albeit a Queen Consort. I'm not sure how they will play the title then, that will depend on public attitudes.

  12. No, thankfully, none!

  13. I am a royal princess and I will do what I want.

  14. Certainly not she is not a blood royal

  15. None.  She is simply "Miss" since Camilla's children have no title of their own to pass on to anyone (thank goodness!).

  16. no.

    No way

  17. no way, the reasons are far too many to list

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 17 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.