The two most frequent arguments used by anthropogenic (man-made) global warming 'skeptics' are
1) Global warming has stopped
2) Global warming is caused by the Sun
In fact, many 'skeptics' use both arguments. However, these two arguments are contradictory.
Looking at the ACRIM satellite data (which shows a greater change in total solar irradiance [TSI] than the PMOD data), the change in TSI from the solar cycle 21 to 22 minima (1986 to 1997) was 0.5 Watts per meter squared. That's less than one-third the radiative forcing from CO2 alone. From 1978-Present, overall TSI has remained essentially unchanged.
http://www.acrim.com/RESULTS/Earth%20Observatory/earth_obs_fig26.pdf
http://www.greenfacts.org/en/climate-change-ar4/figtableboxes/figure-2.htm
In short, there was no significant change in solar output over the past 30 years. So if the Sun was causing global warming, how do you explain the argument that the warming stopped in 1998? You can't have it both ways.
Tags: