Growing up, I always wanted to someday have kids. In the past few years I've been wanting to have kids more and more. (I'm 26) Just putting that out there so you do not mistakenly think I only want kids as a "tool" for money. But recently I've realized that if I was with a partner(assuming I stayed) and had kids, it would actually be less financially exhausting than continuing to support myself alone.
My partner makes a six digit income...even minimal child support payments would provide more than enough to adequately raise a child, plus a little extra to spend on improving my lifestyle so that I won't have to pinch pennies by taking the bus at 3am coming home from work, or so I can move to a slightly bigger place(as opposed to raising a child in a 1bd apartment)...lifestyle improvements that would benefit my safety or the kid.
Now if my partner and I raised the kid together...we would have split bills. Basically I would be splitting his $800 total mortgage on his 3bd house, as opposed to paying $905/mo rent all by myself on my 1bd apartment(this also shows why I hate renting so much!! I want to buy). Overall there'd be MORE financial stability by splitting bills paying child expenses, than paying bills all by myself(not to mention paying more money for 1bd rent than for a 3bd house).
In a weird sorta way, I wonder if my situation is similar to my friend's:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080806064900AAC9AlS
I mean, we've both wanted something for a while(I've wanted kids; my friend's wanted to quit the grocery store). But both of us held off on doing these things because of money issues. But now it's at the point where it might be costing us more to NOT do what we want to do!
What do you think? Has anyone found that they're in a better situation by HAVING kids than not?(i.e., the exception or the anomaly)
Tags: