Has the President given up on finding Osama bin Laden or was he a fictional character created by the CIA?

Question

Considering all the video tapes of him were found to be fake - was he just a regular guy who worked for the CIA and pretended to be a terrorist to blame for 911? Why was Saddam located within days in a deep underground ditch in the middle of no-where but Osama is 'lost' for the past 7 years without a trace?

Answer 1

Bin Laden is most likely real. Is he the true one behind 9/11? I think not. As long as he's out there, the war can have a 'justified' reason to go on. If they catch him, then many Americans will be even more tired of war, and the agenda's mission of conquest is not over yet.

Did you know that 9/11/01 was the ten year annerversary(to the day) of George H Bush's New World Order speech? Check it out.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=4031...

9/11 was a false flag operation. They (Council on Foreign Relations) needed a Pearl Harbor to get the American public behind the war they wanted to start.

  The Federal Reserve created the CFR in 1921 to serve, and push their agenda of a New World Order. Members of the Fed. Reserve own over 90% of the media, so they control 90% of all we see, and hear for news. Pretty easy to get your creep in office when you control the propeganda machine, and news. Currently, over 90% of the members of the State Department, and executive branch are CFR members. Obama, and McCain, as well as Bush Jr, Bush Sr.,   Clinton, and so on are also CFR members. It doesn't take much research, or common sense to figure out who is running our country. It is the bankers!

This is why major US policy has been on a constant straight, and narrow path, regardless whether a Dem, or GOP is at the helm. The differences between them is simply a pony show to distract us, and keep us divided amongst each other as to which is worse. Truth is that either way we have a CFR member running things, which is nothing but a new face pushing the same d**n agenda.

They are currently working on balancing currencies throughout the world(truth to why gas is at $4 a gallon) and the WTO(World Trade Orginazation) would hit a stalling point without the rest of the world on board.

Countres like Afganistan, and Iraq were stand alone self sustaining nations who were doing their own thing, and doing ok at being self sufficent.

We did not go in, and tear down two self sustaining nations, and create welfare states because they were 'terrorists'. I believe wholeheartedly it was because they wouldn't go along with the NWO agenda, so their countries simply became game pieces in the real life game of Monopoly. Why else would Iran be next? They mourned WITH us on 9/11. They have never attacked us on US soil. WTF!?

  A couple thousand dead in the twin towers is small in collateral damage to what they've gained in the interest of a New World Order.

Saddam was a dictator, and had done some very bad things. However, I doubt he killed a million Iraqi's as we have since the Iraq war began. Also, Iraq quit being disussed as much as a war about terrorism, and more about regieme change. Iran is being outright discussed that our objecive for them is regieme change. Hmm...

Hang on... Iran is next. Maybe Bin Laden is there. I heard that they had weapons worser(Bush word) than WMD's.  What better reason to invade, and tear down another nation?

My quandry is whether or not they will have to destroy the world to own it. They have made it clear that they will if nessecary.

Answer 2

No to both your questions - its must be like searching for a needle in a haystack.

Answer 3

Given up. When did he try?

"Frankly,I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he's done such great things about terrorism. He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have done something to stop 9/11. Maybe. We'll never know."

~ (Richard Clarke), Adviser To Reagen, Bush Snr, Clinton & Bush!

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/1...

"..Terror is bigger than one person..So I don't know where [Bin Laden] is..You know, I just don't spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you. ...I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."

~ (Bush) - March 13, 2002 Press Conference at the The James S. Brady Briefing Room

Answer 4

No, he hasn't because I am searching for him, there is a 27 million dollar reward for him. Gotta go, just got a little info on him!

Answer 5

Cup cake, The Clinton administration launched a missile attack against Bin Laden two years before 911.  Many experts believe that 911 was a retaliation for that poorly executed attack.  The finest video experts have examined the Bin Laden videos and up to now, you are the first person to declare them as all fake.  It took months and not days to locate Saddam in his Spider hole.  Saddam was a Tyrant, hated by most of the Iraqi people.  It was inevitable that someone would turn on him.  If, Bin Laden is actually hiding in Pakistan or Afganistan, he is under the protection of people who revere him and hate most of the rest of the world.

Hey Herkk, which president are you referring to?  Last I checked, Bush wasn't running for a third term re-election.

Answer 6

I agree with you and the answer is yes.

Answer 7

You are never given any information about anyone the security services are watching or tracking.  For 30 years the British government kept silent about the identities of the top men in the IRA - even when they had been talking to them since the 1970's.  Same with Bin Laden. By definition anything that is known about him is a matter of national security, and is distributed on a 'need to know' basis.

Answer 8

We don't want him.

America would put him in a country club prison. Give him a color TV and personal trainer. Feed him three big Muslim meals per day complete with imported wine. Give him a team of America's best lawyers, paid for by the tax payers. Take him before a liberal, catch and release judge, who would sentence him to 9,000 years for mass murder, but set his mandatory release date for 9 months. The anti America mass media would then pay him millions of dollars to write a hate filled anti America book which would be bought by all the liberals in America, making him rich like Al Gore. When he was released, he would run for congress as a democrat from New York and he would win in a landslide.

I think we should leave him in his caves.

Answer 9

watch zeitgeist the movie. it will bring you the answers you are looking for.