Have anybody solved the perpetual motion phenomena?

Question

I believe the problem with most of these inventions is that they use a lot of their own power to sustain themselves.I believe I have solved this .Will have a working model soon.

Answer 1

Perpetual motion is impossible. Why would you think otherwise.

Answer 2

I would like to see your working model when it is finished.

Answer 3

Perpetual motion is impossible! Period! Try learning basic physics. And quit wasting your time.

Answer 4

Wow!!! This is great news indeed !!!!!!!!

I have been trying to get hold of a perpetual motion machine. Will certainly buy yours when it hits the market.

We're gonna have fun breaking laws of nature. I just hope it won't break my bank.

Answer 5

Yes, I have designed several perpetual motion devices and the major oil companies have bought them all up.

Just kidding, they just stole them.

Answer 6

While perpetual motion is impossible, the very fact that it IS impossible is used in many thermodynamic calculations. In fact there are two types, called the first kind and the second kind. So while this phenomenon does not exist, it is still extremely useful! Go and use your enthusism to learn thermodynamics, THAT is the pathway to wealth!

Answer 7

If you need some funding to develop your invention, then try this:

Start out with a £5 note. Change it for five £1 coins. Go to a different bank. Change your coins for a note. Repeat until you have several million pounds!

Repeat after me:  Energy is never created nor destroyed, it merely changes from one form to another.

Answer 8

Unequivocally, NO.

If you have a WORKING model I would assume it has some moving parts.

Any moving part will suffer heat losses through friction which will eventually wear out any construction.

Friction is present when any two surfaces are in contact and slide relative to each other.

Friction may occur between solids, liquids and gases or a combination of these states.

Energy cannot be created or destroyed but any change in energy will most definitely incur losses.

An early example is the steam engine where the solid fuel (coal) heated the steam to drive the pistons and thus the wheels.

The overall efficiency of transfer of energy was about 13% to 20%

What you are proposing is a 100% transfer of energy.

Answer 9

NO, stop wasting your time.

Not possible.

People have been trying for hundreds of years, many thousands of inventions, not one has worked.

PS, "perpetual motion phenomena" is a misnomer. perpetual motion scam is closer to reality.

PPS, I like this analogy:

Start out with a £5 note. Go to a bank and change it for five £1 coins (minus a service fee). Go to a different bank. Change your coins for a £1 note, minus another service fee. Repeat until you have several million pounds!