I am surprised that I still hear people arguing about how kids should learn the multiplication tables. The most vocal are the ones that reject the old way when time tables are learnt by rote. Most sales assistants I meet at the shops are not able to do simple mental calculations. They are crippled without the cash registers and electronic calculators. Many supposedly intelligent people portraited in the media seem to regard learing the time tables by rote is a kind of torture or denying kids the chance to think. They even put it as the past or of inferior cultures.
Is this rationalism gone mad? Now we have a whole generation of so many young people having problems with basic mental calculations. In an experiment, after I taught my child the fundamental concepts of multiplication and division in early grade 2, she went on to learn the time tables by rote (in a special way I devised). Within 8 weeks, she pushed her primary teacher to limit in speed and accuracy in all of the tables from 2 to 12. Then at grade 3, she often embarassed sales assistants by telling them them how much change they should give her mum before they managed to get the cash register to tell the answer.
I wonder if the majority of people beleive that the best strategy to learn time tables is by rote like I do? (knowing that there are many ways to learn it by rote, some are better than others)
Tags: