Have you ever seen a picture of a "ghost" that you were unable to explain?

Question

Have you ever seen a picture of a "ghost" that you were unable to explain?

Answer 1

Yes actually a friend of mine who's known to attract trouble went to this old hill(the name is very politicly incorrect lol)  He was taking pictures on his cell phone and he noticed something creepy, but the cell's pic was to small to tell anything.  When he got home he put it on his laptop, inhanced it to get rid of the blurriness(I was over at the time) and showed his family and me.  You could quite clearly see a cloaked figure, two white hands and what looks like a scythe.  I know it sounds cliche but really if you want to see the pic I've got it on my comp to and I'll send it to you.

Answer 2

No, never... !

Answer 3

There's one in this photo, scared me silly!

Answer 4

I've seen plenty of ghost pictures.  Some aren't even pictures of ghosts (i.e. pareidolia), some are obvious fakes and others could be fakes but there's really no definitive way of telling.  One thing I have not seen is a picture of a ghost that is so compelling as to make me think ghosts are real.

Answer 5

I have seen two, both in St. Augustine, Florida.  One was a picture of tourists standing in front of a coquina wall of an old Spanish Fort.  In the picture a wispy, almost transparent torso is pushing at one of the tourists as if to get her to move away.  The figure had an extreme amount of detail, and clearly was that of a native american, with dark skin, braided hair, and a deerskin vest.  Could it have been a double exposure?  I don't know enough about photography, so maybe, but it was convincing.

The other photo was like smoke or a small patch of fog that was forming the shape of a horse with a spaniard on its back.  Many people will think that I was just seeing what I wanted to see, or matrixing something recognizable, but again, the amount of detail, down to the horses hooves and the spaniard's helmet were clearly visible.

In this day and age, "photoshopping" pictures is always a possibility, and digital cameras don't produce negatives to compare the pictures to to check for altering.

Answer 6

No, because all pictures have passed through a camera somewhere. The tricks you can do with cameras are crazy, and so I think it's all tricks.

Answer 7

personally i have not seen that sort of thing.

Answer 8

I would never try to take a picture of a ghost. Too easy to fake/discredit. Better to have a credible, honest reputation, so when you say you saw something, people pay attention without scorn. I never trust 'ghost pictures'.

Answer 9

everything can be explained

Answer 10

No, all of the one's I seen looked fake.

Answer 11

Well I thought I was seeing a ghost when I saw this question again. Then I realized that you were asking it in two sections !

I believe them only if the source is known to me and irrefutable in my eyes. Otherwise i am suspicious.

And yes I have,

Answer 12

Yes of course I have. It was a pic of a person with an unexpected surprise, a ghost rockclimbing in the background.

Answer 13

yes

Answer 14

We took some pictures one Christmas. There was something like a blur that could have looked like a ghost..but we didn't think about it then. Later..we realized there was a ghost in our house...and wondered if that was what we saw in the pictures. I have no idea where those pictures are..but I'd like to find one of them and post it on here some day.

Answer 15

Yea i went to Sir John A. Macdonalds house once, took a picture on the stairs and caught what look to be a shadow of his head. Like the heads on quarters.

It was cool and now i cant find it.

Answer 16

Many times