Here's the $64,000 Question: What does Sarah Palin and Harriet Meyers have in common?

Question

Here's the $64,000 Question: What does Sarah Palin and Harriet Meyers have in common?

Answer 1

One is a Governor, the other is a White House lawyer,,,,,,,aside from being Intelligent Republican women, not much.

Miers is a brilliant lawyer, Governor Palin  is a gifted politician.

Answer 2

they both have over sized clitorises  

Answer 3

who cares Palin is hot.

Answer 4

vaginas.  thanks for the two points.

Answer 5

You probably mean Harriet Miers.

Complete lack of experience and know-how and being appointed to a very high position within the state just for being a redneck of female gender.

Answer 6

cronyism, in bed with big oil, ugly milfs,.... i know  the answer both dont qualify and both are women

Answer 7

I want the money upfront before i answer your question  

Answer 8

they are not muslims

Answer 9

I don't know, but I am sure you will tell me, and I will be surprised.

That said-- Do I still get the money?

Answer 10

OK, I had to google it. I assume you mean Harriet Miers, not meyers (the papers got it wrong too, no problem)

Here is a clip from the wikipedia page on Miers.

'On October 3, 2005, Bush nominated Miers to serve as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Miers' nomination was criticized from people all over the political spectrum based on her never having served as a judge, her perceived lack of intellectual rigor, her close personal ties to Bush, and her lack of a clear record on issues likely to be encountered as a Supreme Court Justice. Many notable conservatives vigorously criticized her nomination, and numerous conservative groups normally considered part of Bush's political base planned to mount an organized opposition campaign.

Miers met with senators since her nomination was first announced, and in those meetings she was ill-prepared and uninformed on the law.[22] Senator Tom Coburn told her privately that she "flunked" and "[was] going to have to say something next time."[23] In mock sessions with lawyers, Miers had difficulty expressing her views and explaining basic constitutional law concepts.[24] Miers had no experience in constitutional law, and did not have extensive litigation experience; at her Texas law firm, she had been more of a manager.[25] Miers had rarely handled appeals and did not understand the complicated constitutional concepts senators asked of her.[26] To White House lawyers, Miers was "less an attorney than a law firm manager and bar association president."'

-------

So I have to agree with Bix's answer.