His is true that archeologists have found dinasorus footprints along with human footprints?

Question

well i have seen google videos on ID where it has been challeged that dynasorus lives milllions years ago. during tertiary period according to them a buried dynasorus with its red blood cells intact has been earthed in alska and secondly the foot prints of dynasorus and humans has been discovered at same levels...

Answer 1

No.What are called "human" are portions of a dinosaur footprint, or carved fakes. Supposedly the footprint inside the dinosaur print came from a man walking EXACTLY in the same spot of each print.

The "Taylor Trail" in Texas supposedly has human footprints in the same rock as dinosaurs.

"I can testify that none of the Taylor Trail tracks (or other trails on the site) contain clear human features, and most do not even closely resemble human prints. In fact, the new "man track" claims are not really new, but are simply variations on the old, thoroughly refuted claims. "

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy/r...

There's a dinosaur track way located in a stream near Glen Rose,Texas It's been know since c.1918. During the 1930s several locals made money chiseling "giant" foot prints into loose rocks and selling them.

The so-called "man tracks" are those of a biped dinosaur. They show the V form rear as well as other typical dinosaur foot characteristics. Once these were examined and discredited has human the creationist claims were that a man followed the dinosaurs and stepped exactly in each of the dinosaur tracks Added to this are creationist claims that tracks were cut out, vandalized and have eroded. (any evidence has vanished. Sounds like an "X-Files" episode)

Most creationists have quietly dropped their claims of the tracks. There's still some sites out there claiming their human and likely that's where you learned about it.

If you do a search "Taylor Trail" or "Human dinosaur" in Yahoo answers, you'll find more then a half dozen times this question has been asked and answered.

Answer 2

Actually it is true. Dr. Carl Baugh (spelling?) down in texas has a photograph of him along side the foot prints. The human footprint is actually inside the Dinasaur footprint showing that they probably occurred within moments of eachother.

Answer 3

Nay, his not true. No homo species in tertiary period.

Answer 4

That notion is absolutely false.

Answer 5

No!

Answer 6

that must be very false. humans and dinosaurs lived millions of years apart. and as for one of the answers above mine about a human print and dinosaur print, the dinosaur print must have came first then fossilized. after a couple thousand years of soil and material build-up, a human must have stepped in the same place... a couple more thousands of years and voila a human print fossilized on top of a dinosaur one.

Answer 7

No, not true.  Humans did not co-exist with dinosaurs and were millions of years apart.  Chances are it was an uncovered footprint with a more recent human print alongside/inside it.  

It would be possible to find them in layers of soil that are near each other due to soil movement and land shifting, but they did not co-exist.

Answer 8

Yes...there are many evidences of man and dinosaurs co-existing until fairly recent times from around the world. Many cave paintings, drawings, temple carvings, petroglyph's, fabrics and ancient artifacts.

Human and dino footprints have been found together in a site in Arizona... horse hooveprints and dinosaurs also.

A temple carving of a stegosaur from Angkor Wat, Cambodia circa 1200 AD

http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks-cambod...

Other evidence of man and dinosaurs co-existing

http://www.dinosaursandhumans.org/

http://www.creationscience.com/onlineboo...

Answer 9

No, and it's just more of the same old same old.

Man and dinosaurs did not co-exist and anyone who claims that they did is writing theology, not science. There are desperate people who are so determined to deny the truth, they are making jokes of themselves. And people can't believe everything they see on television.

There are some very old human foot prints. But by the time man came along, dinosaurs as such were gone for a million years or more. The evidence of a dinosaur's path is not fresh mud, but hardened material that could stand up for millions of years.

Show me someone who makes this claim and I'll show a preacher in a lab suit imitating a monkey on television.

People who bring this stuff to answers aren't looking for answers that have anything to do with science. If they did, they would have to actually spend some time doing their homework without someone looking over their shoulder, in effect, and saying, nope, can read that. It's against the bible.

Most religions have worked past this and their limited human understanding. There are great religious schools with truly outstanding science programs and research.

There just don't happen to be any that work on creationism or intelligent design because there is ZERO science in it -- and that's true of this question.

It's essential  to start with is what a hypothesis is and what a theorem is. Evolution is not "just a theory" in the sense of someone's brain wave exploding into an understanding of something scientific. It requires observation, evidence, repeatability. A working hypothesis may be very close to fact, but to become a theory, it has to reach a different level.

A theory is a construction that poses answers that are based on facts and supported by evidence and peer reviewed by scientists, not the sunday televangelist lining his pockets.

Most don't understand the theory of relativity.  And they don't know quantum mechanics either.

E=MC (with the 2 as squared) is still "just a theory" and it doesn't answer every question. Einstein worked for decades on another difficult problem, but died without finding an answer he found acceptable.

But if someone doesn't believe in scientific theory being more than just a theory, consider that Einstein's theory had a concrete effect.Those bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the offspring of scientists, not a bunch of people sitting around with their preacher making up nonsense.

People are free to believe anything they want to. But no one should ask someone to believe things that are provably false.

Answer 10

Nope, it's not true.  Follow the link below to see a thorough debunking.  What was found were dinosaur footprints that looked kinda like human ones until an expert looked at them.  There were also normal rock formations or cracks that happened to look like human footprints.  They don't pass closer inspection.

Answer 11

it IS true that creationists have found what APPEARS to be a single human footprint in the same context as a dinosaur footprint... paleontologists identify the 'human' print as a partial print from a (possibly even the same) dinosaur... you can choose who to believe, but i think it's pretty obvious that the creationists are desperately reaching for a hint of scientific legitimacy.