History Channel V.S. Fox News?

Question

What do you prefer and what are your likes and dislikes?

history channel- I actually watch it, it has actual facts, is not biased, and doesnt have all this c**p scrolling all over the freakin screen trying to make it look interesting and legit.

fox news- c**p, c**p, c**p and blah blah blah obama is the devil, thats all they talk about

Answer 1

History Channel. It's a lot more interesting.

Answer 2

how could you compare the two? one is a news Chanel and ones a history Chanel. they are totally different and to answer your question I'd watch fox over history Chanel any day

Answer 3

History channel is good, Discovery Science and NASA channel are good to. I like to get my news from BBC America and CCTV9(English language Chinese channel)

Answer 4

How do you know what fox is unless you watch it.  History channel is good but it is not the bible, consult other sources, don't limit yourself.  The BBC is best because it doesn't slant the news like American channels do.  If you want to know about Obama look at his initials...BO.

Answer 5

The History Channel is filet mignon, Faux is pig balls.

Answer 6

LOL I couldn't agree with you more!

☼

Answer 7

How do you know they are 'facts'? Were you there or do you just believe it because you know no better?

Answer 8

Everyone enjoys different things.  Who are we to tell what channel people should view.

Democracy remember that word.  It means freedom.  As long as we are not hurting other people we are free to do, and say what we want in America.  Where do you reside?  Obaman is not a devil, but he sure has peculiar friends.  Reverend Wright (wrong), and Ayers who bombed the Pentagon many years ago and has no regrets about it.

Answer 9

it beats Katie Curic

Answer 10

There's NO basis for Comparison. The History Channel presents Programs on Events that HAVE been.  While Fox broadcasts Programs based on figments of their Hosts Imaginations...  :0