Honest question! (plz 4 get ur chiva or americanista)?

Question

ok honestly ..i had a big discusion yesterday with this and alot of ppl agreed with me...ok here it goes....i personally think in my oppinion that cuatemoc blanco did not have anything to do with any of the 2 gols!! the first one he anit do nutin da second one in the free kick the ball was not going to hit him...his intension was to go after the ball thats why he moved and turned around............plz opinions.......

Answer 1

First goal he gave salcido the long ball that looked too long and he back heeled to guille who crossed it and Pavel scored what i think has been the best goal of mexico in the past year.

Second goal he moved out of the way and blocked the keepers view, come on its cuau if he had really wanted to touch it he would if back heeled it or something.

Cuauhtemoc doesn't just help by giving good passes or not, he does it by pulling defenders to mark him more closely which spreads out the other team and gives our players more areas to attack.

Answer 2

Cuatemoc is a role model to every mexican player, he did help!!! he got the team (animado) know what i mean?  

Answer 3

cau entered the game and suddenly mexico has the lead, I think everyone got a boost from when he entered

Answer 4

That is true, he didn't have nothing  do to with the goals physically, but mentally, alot! The moment he entered the game the crowd went crazy and the players got a boost of motivation and adrenaline running through them just because of Cuauhtemoc's  presence on the field.

Answer 5

ur right he didnt it was Pardo and plus im Chivista and i RESPECT BLANCO

Answer 6

he acctually did make a difference the hondureans players began to worry and mess up more and he gave his team mates some spirit

if that doesnt count then you are a cuntbag

Answer 7

i agree about the first goal.

The second one, it seemed to me he saw it was going in, and he MOVED out of the way to 1, get off the potential offside, and 2, let the ball go in

Answer 8

yes, pardo had to do with the goals because chuatemoc tried to head it in but couldnt so it was all pardo

Answer 9

IDK I try to see the goals on the internet but they look crappy.

I dont mean the goals were.I mean the videos I see on the Internet are crappy.

Answer 10

You know what i'm probably going to get a lot of thums down for this but the fact is that Cuatemoc did have a lot to do with the second goal, not so much the first one and here's why:

1st gol Temoc sends a long pass to left corner which Franco let's go but Salcido does an aswome play to save the ball and from that pass on the play restarts and ends in Pardo's golazo.

2nd gol before Pardo even start running to kick the ball Temoc was already making his move to distract the goalie.  I've seen many old players pull this card.  The reason they do that is to block the goalie's vision and keep them from moving comfortably in their own area.  Look at it this way, if temoc was in the way and ball was a centro instead of a direc kick by Blanco standing in front of the goalie he was going to block his vision of the ball and if some one heads the ball, what are the chances of the goalie having a good reaction on a ball they can't see through out half the play.  

In this case the ball was kicked directly to the goal by Pardo and Blanco was running towards the front of the goalie, before the kick was even made, so how can you tell me he was looking for the ball if he was getting out of the ball's way before it even got kicked.  That is the difference between a goaleador and a play creator, and those details that people don't really catch is the reason why Temoc is the best player in the MLS and to be honest with as much Chiva as I am, Temoc is still the best Mexican player currently active.  Either way if the ball would have been a centro or direct kick Temoc was making sure the goalie's vision was blocked he wasn't looking to score, and if he could use an Honduras player to help him block the goalie's vision more by dragging a marca he probably would of done that too.

Saludos........

Answer 11

I'm going to have to disagree with you on this!!  Once he came the whole game changed!!  The crowed got rolling, and the rest of the team got fired up!  The first goal....your not going to deny that it was a GOLAZO FROM PARDO!!!, and the second goal was thanks to a foul that Temo caused!!  If it was not for that foul....we would not see the second goal!!  Keep in mind that Honduras knows Temo and once he was on the field two or more players were swarming him!!  Leaving other players open!!  So again....I disagree with you and just because the goals were not from him...that doesn't mean that he didn't help the team lift its spirits up and help them win the game!!  

Answer 12

Actually he had some part in the second goal. He's the one that got fouled for Pavel to perform the free kick.

But its a team so everybody had part in both goals.

Answer 13

I know we're pissed at eachother fer this arguement

but if you re watched like a minute or so before el golazo de Pardo, the 1st one,

Blanco was part of la jugada.

He passed it to Salcido all the way at the corner kick spot.

Then Salcido i think passed it to Guille and he passed to Pardo and there was el gol

the 2nd one was falta contra Cuautemoc.

then Pardo cobro el tiro libre.

I was watching Futbol Picante, and they agree with me

sooo.

yeahh

his help wasn't as huge as people expected

but it did.

If Errickson would've put him in earlier, ithink that el empate would've come sooner,

or we woul've scored atleast one more gol

Answer 14

In the first goal Blanco passed the ball to Salcido and thats how the play started. In the second goal he blocked the goalie from seeing the ball. The ball was gonna hit him but he got out of the way, allowing the ball to go inside the goal.

Answer 15

no but he got mexico rolling