How's this trade (NYK, Denver, LAC)?

Question

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=165~2772~509~1017~366~125~566~847&teams=12~7~7~12~18~18~18~18&te=&cash=7:18

Maybe the Knicks would give a draft pick to the Clippers.

Answer 1

this trade isnt really benificial to anybody . It helps the clippers in that they get a halfcourt bigman who can score and rebound and a solid 2 guard and they get younger. The knicks are not greatly improved by throwin 4 thirty year olds on thier team while trading away a young pf that can rebound very well, just like ai and melo never went anywhere besides the first round. marbury to the nuggets makes sence i guess since they dont have a pg david lee can definatly run with them but they dont really improve that much.

Answer 2

HORRIBLE. New york has to pay 47 million

Answer 3

I think this trade would benefit the knicks big time they would clear up cap room in time for the lebron lottery and they would have a playoff bound roster to give the fans of NY something to cheer about as far as for the nuggets i don't see them doing well wit an addition of David Lee that would give them another forward who deserves playing time i think something like this would be key in the future of the clippers also who could definitely use a power forward replacement f or camby and also an upgrade at the 2guard with Crawford. As a knick fan it would boost Garden revenues with the acquisition of AI and the return of Camby.

Answer 4

I actually like it!

Answer 5

Hi

Answer 6

This trade makes alot of sense the clippers gave up nothing for camby so why not trade him for something in zach randolph who is no elton brand but hey.

Now this may actually work for the nuggets more playing time for J.R. Smith, they can move kenyon martin, NENE, and David lee around. but they may not like how much of a ball hog Stephon is.

Also the knicks get expiring contracts along with players to keep people happy and coming to the garden until 2010

Answer 7

Knicks are in the process of securing enough money to get LeBron James when he is a free agent in 2010.  So taking on a bunch of over-paid players aren't the best option.

Answer 8

Nah... Knicks get the better deal while LA and Denver get sorry players...

Will never happen...

Answer 9

The Clippers and Nuggets both get screwed. I understand they are trying to rebuild and expiring contracts would make sense, but they all already have that. And despite the fact that they are trying to rebuild, they still want to sell some tickets.

Answer 10

nope.  Way too much money and 2010 is a huge free agency markey whom the Knicks and Nets want LeBron, or Wade, Or Bosh