How about "The National Enquirer" breaking the story about Edwards' affair?

Question

Who would have figured they would get the story first--and it's true?! Pretty amazing that such a rag could get such a story.

Answer 1

I am so speechless! how could he? Well he is a man.......

Answer 2

National Enquirer rocks.

They are the ones who broke Bill Clinton s*x scandal months before the New York Times reported it.

Answer 3

The problem is all the other "rumors" they publish that are not true

Answer 4

Oh, the left wing liberal bias Democrat media knew. They just didn't tell it. Edwards thought he was safe because of the media bias. He just didn't count on "The Enquirer" getting the news out there! Good for them.

Answer 5

It's true, but here's this perspective:  mainstream media (including FOX) wasn't going through the sewer like the National enquirer.

Value of the story is much less as you consider John Edwards doesn't have a public office now and was not  receiving consideration for VP, you can bet Obama's people already had  details on the subject..

Answer 6

If you follow someone long enough, you will get some kind of a story.

Its sad that they choose to break this "story" when Edwards is neither in office or running for office.  What is the point other than hurting everyone concerned?

Answer 7

and they have a ton of evidence against him that they can prove, he is even saying that he wasnt at the hotel to see his mistress last month when they ambushed him, but the cops showed up  in the morning after the supposed visit to a male friend where they found him hiding in a bathroom