How about this 3 team trade? Realistic!?

Question

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1711~1981~991~2004~3244~125&teams=12~20~4~12~12~20&te=&cash=

NOTE: CHANGE KIRK HINRICH TO BEN GORDON. I used Hinrich becuase Gordon is a RFA and has yet to be signed, but wants something around 10 million which is what Hinrich makes.

That being said, I think all teams here are winners:

Chicago: Get the defensive minded center they lack while only giving up Gordon (Who will not likely sign with them anyway, so they may as well get something for him) and Drew Gooden who would now be unnecessary with Dalembert starting at center and Thomas at pf with Noah coming off the bench to player either pf or center, plus Nocioni plays some pf and then you also have Gray to play some center.

Philidelphia: Get an upgrade at the 2 guard while not butting anyone on the team out of position because they also lose Green, and make up for the loss of Dalembert with a great defensive veteran center in Camby.

Clippers: Lose only an unnecessary center in Camby (already have a better center in Kaman) while gaining a very solid role player as either a 6th man or a starter in Willie Green, a great f/c in Drew Gooden to provide a great backup for Kaman or even a starting pf (He averages about 14ppg and 9rpg), and adds to their overall depth by adding a solid and young forward in Young.

Overall, it really is a win-win-win for all three teams. What do you think?

Answer 1

The Philadelphia will absolutely had the advantage in that trade.

The Chicago is insane if they do that.

The Clippers are fools if they ever think that Camby is not enough.

Answer 2

not the best trade, but a good one

Answer 3

marcus camby just got on the team clippers!!!

Answer 4

I strongly respect you for putting a somewhat decent trade an answers.  I always wanted to compare logical trades, but there were always the retards who traded away half the team.

However, there are still problems with this trade.

Chicago:

really needs to package off hinrich with hughes, who has been a bust so far.

Philly:

get the best part of the deal.  Would be very happy.  Very

Clippers:

Dont need Thaddeus.  Have an almost identical player (young SF prospect) in Thornton.  In addition, Gooden is still a dropoff to Camby.

Answer 5

The Clippers are starting Camby and Kaman. Gooden isn't a center he's a power forward and he barely ever plays spot minutes at center. Tyrus Thomas has been a bust so far. Dalembert is an okay center and i do think he'd help chicago. It would be crazy seeing Camby in Philly with Elton Brand... but still i just don't see them wanting to take on Camby's contract and Gordon's (which would be a 5 to 6 year deal) contract after signing Lou Williams, Andre Iguodala and Elton Brand.

So i don't think the teams you've including in this trade would move these players for your reasons.

Some of the combinations you have are interesting. but i don't think its win-win-win.

hope that helps.

Answer 6

Si, me gusta este!

Answer 7

Depends on if the Bulls really want to break up the team

before Del ***** gets to coach, and if Kaman wants to stay with the Clippers, which would be a selling point to the players traded

Answer 8

Chicago wont do that for Dalembert MAN