0 LIKES LikeUnLike
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=3207~1981~988~306~3444~3012~2171~3196&teams=29~26~4~29~29~14~4~26&te=&cash=NOTE: CHANGE KIRK HINRICH FOR BEN GORDON! Gordon would have to be signed and traded and his contract would likely be around 10 million so I used Hinrich since he makes 10 million and the espn trade machine won't let you use free agents in trades.I truly think that this is a win-win-win-win for the teams. Here's how the teams would look after the trade:Chicago: They make sure that they don't lose Ben Gordon for nothing (He has said he is done playing for the Bulls because they won't give him the money he wants.) They also fill a void in the need of a center (Darko Milicic who is still only 23 and avg. 7ppg 6rpg and 1.6bpg in just 24mpg last season which is respectable for a starting 7 foot center. They also get another 6-11 guy with an expiring contract who can play some center for the next year.Utah: They get the guy that they've wanted for years in Ben Gordon (remember Gordon replaces Hinrich) and an expiring contract of another good backup guard while giving up only un-necessary players.Memphis: They lose only Milicic and a member of their already heavily crowded back-court and get 2 young, cheap centers to help make up for the loss of Milicic as well as a very solid forward to be a sixth man for g*y or Warrick.Miami: Give up an unneeded shooting guard and get the point guard that they need badly to compliment Dwayne Wade in the backcourt.I think that every team in this trade is a winner, what do you think? Who comes out of this the biggest winner and who is the biggest loser?
Tags:
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Latest activity: earlier. This question has 7 answers.