How can Qadiyanis claim that Mirza had all the qualities of Jesus ?

Question

He had NOTHING that Jesus had so why do they say he was Jesus? If they're talking about Jesus coming back in a spiritual sense.....well that is just funny. Why does Jesus specifically have to come back in a 'spiritual' sense and why didn't Allah just send another prophet if he wasn't gonna send the same Jesus?

Answer 1

Mirza?

Oh, he declared that Jesus came from a family of prostitutes. Also accused Jesus of drinking and 'inclination towards prostitutes'.

'Three grandmothers of Jesus were immoral adultresses"

Probably tried to prove himself better than Jesus.

Answer 2

There is only one Ahmadis 1qfactor here that can actually answer these type of Questions

Either way he is a very tough nut to Crack LOL

Answer 3

Actually Allah did send another Prophet, that's who Hazrat Ahmad (as) is...another Prophet.

Jews wanted a Messiah to destroy the non Jews and establish Jews as unified kings through force

Muslims want a Messiah who will destroy the non believers and establish Muslims as unified kings through force.

Jesus (as) taught that only through love and understanding will his message spread, and was rejected by many at first.

Ahmad (as) taught that only through love and understanding Islam will spread, and was rejected by many at first.

Jesus (as) came to revive the law of Musa (as) without changing even a bit.

Ahmad (as) came to revive the law of Muhammad (sa) without changing even a bit.

Jesus (as) brought the true teaching and hence the 72nd sect.  All other 71 sects united against him (first time in Jewish history this happend)

Ahmad (as) brought the true teaching and hence the 73rd sect.  All other 72 sects united against him (first time in Islams history this happend)

Many more similarities dear friend.

EDIT:

@HTL - No need to apologize to me brother, all you did was fulfill what Allah says in the Holy Qur'an.

YaSin Chapter 36 : Verse 31

Alas for my servants! there comes not a Messenger to them but they mock at him.

EDIT:

@Asker - This was the analogy the Prophet (sa) himself used.  It was a sign to the Muslims that the Messiah will be just like Jesus (as).  Whatever happened to Jesus as far as the persecution he and his people faced, the unified Jewish front against him, the message of peace and revival he brought, that exact same thing will happen to the true Messiah of Islam.

In fact the Prophet (sa) said that the Muslims will resemble the Jews so much that it will be as if one shoe resembles the other.  These are the words of our Prophet.  It was to be a sign for the Muslims to recognize truth when it comes.

Think about it, the Jews rejected Hazrat Yahya (as) because they were waiting for Hazrat Elijah (as) to physically descend from heaven.  But Hazrat Yahya (as) said that he is the spiritual return of Hazrat Elijah (as).  Hazrat Isa (as) told the Jews the same thing but they still rejected him.

As Muslims we know that Hazrat Elijah (as) will not physically return and Hazrat Yahya (as) was that spiritual return that the Jews were awaiting.

Isn't it interesting that Muslims have made the same belief?  That someone is alive in heaven and will physicall return?

EDIT:

@HTL - There you go again brother.  Of course you don't consider him a Messenger.  Because Messengers are ALWAYS mocked at.  And this verse is NOT about Muhammad(sa) dear brother.  It clearly says, there comes NOT A MESSENGER.  Meaning, anytime a Messenger comes, he is mocked at.  I have no idea how in the world anyone can make it mean only Muhammad (sa).  Allah bless you brother.

EDIT:

@Sister Maryam - Actually my dear sister if you read the book yourself instead of an excerpt from an anti Ahmadi website you'd know the truth.

In 1888 the Christians of India had declared that 1 million Muslims had been converted to Islam.  These Christians used to slander the Prophet (sa) and make him out to be a horrible person.  The layman Muslims were impressed by this and said that Jesus (as) had to be better (naudhobillah) and converted to Christianity.

Hazrat Ahmad (as) clearly says that he has nothing but honor for Jesus (as), but because of the actions of the Christians, he is forced to use their own words against them.  He then cited the Holy Bible and made the statements you are saying - that according to the Christians own books, Hazrat Isa (as) was this type of person.  However, as Muslims we honor and love him as a perfect Prophet of God.

Moreover, Hazrat Ahmad (as) was not the only scholar of his time doing this, most every Muslim scholar who knew the Bible wrote these types of comments, not to insult Isa (as), but to defend the perfect charecter of Muhammad (sa).

My dear sister, if you had read the books on your own, you would have known that.  Allah bless you always.

EDIT:

@Asker - Most certainly all prophets emphasized love and compassion.  My point is, taking into account how the Jews wanted a Messiah to destroy all others, the Muslims want a Messiah who will wage violent Jihad.  Both Isa (as) and Ahmad (as) taught that violent war is not needed, and that was one reason why they were rejected.  That is the point I'm trying to make.  Allah bless you always.

EDIT:

@Asker - As I said in the other question, is it impossible that Isa (as) learned another language?  Is that so hard?  Or is it easier to ascend to heaven and live for 2000 years?  Oh, Allah can do whatever He wants?  Then why do you object to Isa (as) learning a new language?  

And I already answered your question about the likeness of Isa (as).  Refer to that please.  Allah bless you.

love for all, hatred for none

Answer 4

Dare to answer this one?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?...

1qfactor gave you an excellent answer i believe!

Answer 5

He followed Musaylima the dajjal