Alright.. everyone knows child pornography is illegal and everyone hates it and it is so disgusting, but what about some of those teen and underage modeling sites depicting young girls (under 17) in skimpy bikinis posing suggestively, or on top of another young female and they are both smiling, or pre-teens all over each other in a bath tub, or all soapy and clinging to each other.
Another example is a picture of a girl standing up and her shirt is up to her chest area, showing her tummy and wearing short shorts, or another picture of a pre-teen with a towel covering her nude body so they are not showing her b*****s or v****a. Those kind of things make me wonder.. are some child/pre-teen/teen modeling websites the legal version of child pornography? Are they getting away with more then we notice?
All of these sites have a legal notice. And they are all similar in what they say. "All the content found on (site name) does not contain any nudity or sexually explicit material. All content is artistic, non-nude and all images have been checked to assure appropriateness for appearance on this site."
Little by little, they will be bridging the gap between child p**n and child modeling. It will take a while, but thats the plan, don't let people notice, one year a pre-teen model is waving at a camera on a beach in a bikini.
People will say "Thats fine, the picture looks nice." The next year, it will be a different model on a beach with her finger in her mouth
"Oh, so cute" The next year a model on a beach with a smaller bikini
And the next year, less bikini more skin, more suggestive, but hey! It is not sexual, she isn't nude or having intercourse, so we can't be sued! Maybe I am crazy for thinking this but I want your opinions.. any thoughts on this issue?
Tags: